• Home
  • NAMA property for sale
  • About
  • The Developers
  • The Tranches

NAMA Wine Lake

Click the green link above for latest news and over 2,600 related articles. NAMA – National Asset Management Agency – part of Ireland's response to its banking crisis and property bubble

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Civil servant mentality rearing its head at NAMA
Court case set to shed light on McNamara’s business in Nigeria »

Burning the bondholders – by how much have they been singed?

January 21, 2013 by namawinelake

BurnedSubs(Click to ENLARGE)

Although not a single senior bondholder in bust Irish banks has been left behind in our financial crisis and all have so far been repaid 100%, we have been burning junior – or subordinated – bondholders since 2008. By “burning” we mean imposing or negotiating a discount or “haircut” on loans provided by the junior bondholders to Irish banks. Junior bonds are loans by investors to banks are more risky than senior bonds, and the parlous state of Irish banks was used a justification to burn these bondholders. Unfortunately, the ECB has flatly refused to permit Irish banks to impose haircuts on senior bondholders, even the ones in the zombiest of banks, Anglo.

So, how much have we burned?

In the Dail last week, the Sinn Fein social protection and housing spokespersons Anegus O’Snodaigh and Dessie Ellis asked Minister for Finance Michael Noonan for the figures since 2008, the year in which our financial crisis really exploded. To date since the start of 2008, we have repaid €26bn of junior bonds, but we only paid €12bn meaning we imposed haircuts totaling €14bn or an average 55% haircut.

Most of the haircutting was imposed during the tenure of the previous government, and pro-rataing the annual 2011 haircuts for 2 months representing the first two months of 2011 when the previous government was in power and adding those haircuts to the 2008-2010 haircuts, means that the previous administration was in power when about €9bn of the haircuts were imposed. The new administration oversaw €5bn of haircuts.

And why didn’t we burn more?

Minister Noonan merely says “I understand that these transactions were commercial decisions for the Institutions following consultation with their financial advisors” which is about as hands-off as you can get and contrasts with the lap-of-honour language being used in 2011.

And why is Minister Noonan no longer trumpeting the €5bn of haircuts since he took over?

Not sure, but one reason might be the series of law suits presently ongoing in the United States and the UK. We found out for the first time last week in the responses, that IBRC repaid €119m of subordinated bondholders in 2010 and imposed a haircut. One of the bondholders, a German company called Assénagon took Anglo or IBRC to court in the UK last year and won its case at London’s High Court which means that IBRC remains responsible for the haircut imposed on those bonds. That haircut isn’t public but in 2010, IBRC imposed average haircuts of 84% which, if applicable to the €119m of bonds about which Assenagon sued, would mean IBRC is liable to pay back €100m to those bondholders. In New York, Fir Tree is appealing the potential for a haircut, and Bank of Ireland junior bondholders are pursuing an action in the UK.

Whilst IBRC has appealed the Assenagon decision to the UK’s appeal courts and the hearing is scheduled for March 2013, as things stand, IBRC and in fact the other Irish banks face a raft of legal challenges on the €14bn so far burned. That might be why Minister Noonan is suddenly silent.

The full parliamentary question and response is here.

Deputy Dessie Ellis: To ask the Minister for Finance the process undertaken to redeem subordinated and junior bonds at the Covered Institutions, Covered Institutions (details supplied); and specifically the way the haircut offers were derived.

Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh: To ask the Minister for Finance if he will set out in tabular form by year for 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 for each of the Covered Institutions (details supplied), the total subordinated and junior bonds repaid including the nominal value of the bonds, the sums actually paid and the haircut representing the difference between the two.

Minister for Finance, Michael Noonan: I propose to answer questions 59 and 60 together.

SubTableNoonan

1)        BOI figures are rounded to their nearest hundred million.

2)        Consideration provided as part of the Liability Management Exercises was in the form of cash, equity and other debt instruments.

3)        Foreign exchange rates are as at end financial period.

4)        On 27 July 2012, the English High Court delivered a judgement granting declaratory relief against IBRC in favour of Assénagon. The effect of the Assénagon judgement is that the redemption of certain dated notes by the Bank during November and December 2010 was invalid and consequently these notes therefore continue in existence on their original terms. The Bank continues to honour quarterly coupon obligations in respect of the notes pending the outcome of the Appeal.

The purpose of the Liability Management Exercise (LME) transactions was to create additional core tier 1 capital and to strengthen the quality of the capital base of the Banks.

I understand that these transactions were commercial decisions for the Institutions following consultation with their financial advisors.

Advertisement

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Banks, IMF, Irish economy, Politics | 7 Comments

7 Responses

  1. on January 21, 2013 at 5:02 pm eoin murtagh

    How can a German company bring IBRC to court in England? Surely the English courts do not have any jurisidiction in the case?
    The reason I say this, is because last week a judge said (in response to a IBRC creditor going bankrupt in the UK) I do not care what happens in the UK, we have jurisdiction and he is right. We only need to look at the amount of bankruptcy cases which are being overturned at IBRC’s whims.


    • on January 21, 2013 at 9:42 pm john gallaher

      @eoin here is the judgement…the US ones were issued in states.

      “Clause 38 of the Trust Deed provided for it to be governed by English law, subject to certain irrelevant exceptions, and clause 39 contained a sufficient submission to the jurisdiction of the English courts for the purposes of these proceedings.”

      http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2012/2090.html


  2. on January 21, 2013 at 6:46 pm Disillusioned

    Finally, some transparency in relation to payments to Bondholders.
    Many thanks for the update as it explains the current news-blackout from our mainstream media regarding this subject.


  3. on January 21, 2013 at 7:44 pm Joseph Ryan

    Liquidate IBRC. Pronto. The decision not to liquidate is stupid, reckless and an open invitation to every carpetbagger and shark in the world to load up on IBRC junk bonds and have a go at the hapless whore that is the present Irish State.


  4. on January 22, 2013 at 2:44 pm MSM

    http://www.irishexaminer.com/archives/2012/1030/world/bondholder-debt-could-cost-banks-extra-460m-212376.html


    • on January 22, 2013 at 2:51 pm namawinelake

      @MSM, many thanks indeed, isn’t it amazing what a Freedom of Information request can reveal when the minister refused to answer the direct question.

      18th September 2012

      Deputy Pearse Doherty: To ask the Minister for Finance the quantum of maximum potential additional costs that the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation may incur, should IBRC’s appeal against the 27 July 2012 decision by the High Court in England in respect of the application by Assenagon Asset Management SA, fail and if IBRC is exposed to claims from other holders of subordinated notes..

      Minister for Finance, Michael Noonan: As the Deputy notes IBRC is appealing the decision of the High Court in England in relation to this matter. It would be inappropriate for me to comment on the likely outcome of that appeal or the potential impact of the judgment while the appeal is on-going.


  5. on January 22, 2013 at 4:29 pm john gallaher

    There was a ‘campaign’ against burning them bondholders,hope you sitting down before reading it……its from bondholders perspective.
    Same web site also includes an interesting review of the issues involved in Assenagon V Anglo Irish.

    http://www.fixedincomeinvestments.org.uk/home/bank-of-ireland-13-375-subordinated-bonds

    Despite the rhetoric and ’emotion’ about ‘burning bondholders’,there are some very important legal issues at stake,the advisers to the Irish govt. have a lot to answer for,appears to be another f**k up by the DofF or a “paddy cram down” may even be illegal….
    Decent summary of some the legal issues.

    http://www.olswang.com/articles/2012/08/case-note-assenagon-asset-management-sa-v-ibrc-(formerly-anglo-irish-bank)/



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Posts

    • Test – 12 November 2018
    • Farewell from NWL
    • Happy 70th Birthday, Michael
    • Of the Week…
    • Noonan denies IBRC legal fees loan approval to Paddy McKillen was in breach of European Commission commitments
    • Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to be added as notice party in Sean Dunne’s bankruptcy
    • NAMA sues Maria Byrne and Graham Byrne in Dublin’s High Court
    • Johnny Ronan finally wins a court case
  • Recent Comments

    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Dorothy Jones on Of the Week…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Foody on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Frank Street on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    who_shot_the_tiger on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Brian Flanagan on Of the Week…
    Robert Browne on Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to b…
  • Twitter Updates

    • Funniest case in Irish legal history? 1. ex-Cllr Fred Forsey convicted of RECEIVING a corrupt payment 2. developer… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Really looking forward to this at 9pm tonight, esp the first Garda on the scene. Well worth reading this background… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Tea time on the day the president of the ECB tells us we [in Ireland] are paying more interest on our loans than th… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • “I am grateful for you to refer to Mr Sugarman...on the specific question of Unicredit, responsibility at ECB lies… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • @JMcGuinnessTD now confronts ECB about "the honest whistleblower" @WhistleIRL and his disclosures of liquidity issu… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Details, including court documents of class action in New York against Ryanair and CEO Michael O'Leary.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Draghi tells @paulmurphy_TD the ECB doesn't remove govts, the people do, that's democracy. Bet the people will be m… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Wow! Draghi says there is no net interest cost for the Anglo bonds whilst they're held by the Irish central bank. T… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    Follow @namawinelake
  • Click on date for that day’s posts

    January 2013
    M T W T F S S
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
    « Dec   Feb »
  • Blog Stats

    • 5,113,732 hits

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Join 1,326 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: