Last week, the focus on bankers’ salaries and pensions intensified and unfortunately for the bankers, I don’t think their time in that news cycle sun has expired just yet. But this morning, we turn to NAMA and its salaries and perks.
In the Dail last week, the Fianna Fail finance spokesperson Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance Michael Noonan to provide the salaries including perks of the NAMA staff. And it turns out that 12 of the 227 NAMA staff have packages worth more than €200,000 per year. It should be stressed that the figures provided include not just basic salary but also employer pension contributions – running at a modest 5% of salary on average at NAMA according to information recently released – plus allowances and benefits. “Allowances and benefits” might include private health insurance and car allowance.
There is one NAMA person whose salary and benefits are greater than €500,000 per annum and the betting would be that this is Brendan McDonagh, the NAMA CEO whose basic salary is €430,000 though he has waived 15% of this in 2012 and is now earning €365,500. It’s quite a leap from €365,500 to over €500,000 it must be said and given the average NAMA pension contribution of 5%, the difference is unlikely to be accounted for by pensions. Though having said that, Mike Aynsley the CEO of the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation gets a contribution to his pension of 25% of salary.
There’s one staff member on €400,000 – €500,000 and the betting would be that this is John Mulcahy, NAMA’s most senior property man and member of the NAMA board.
There are two staff members on €300,000 – €400,000 and it is less clear who these might be, but Head of Asset Recovery, Ronnie Hanna and CFO, Donal Rooney would clearly be in the frame.
There are a further nine staff members on €200,000 – €300,000. Again, it should be stressed that these financial figures include pension contributions and allowances.
All NAMA staff whose salary exceeded €200,000 were asked in December 2011 by Minister Noonan to waive 15% of their salaries in 2012 or the portion over €200,000 whichever was lesser. All complied but apparently the request contributed to the decision of NAMA’s Head of Lending, Graham Emmett to resign. In April 2012, Minister Noonan made a similar request to the 30 staff at IBRC whose annual salaries exceed €200,000 and they told the Minister, who is the sole shareholder in 100% of the shares of IBRC, to get lost.
The comparison with IBRC is shown above, and IBRC’s figures are extracted from this press report as the PQ from Deputy McGrath doesn’t appear to be online.
The full parliamentary question and response are here:
Deputy Michael McGrath: To ask the Minister for Finance the number of staff that are on a total remuneration package including pension payments, allowances and benefits between €100,000 and €200,000, between €200,000 and €300,000, between €300,000 and €400,000, between €400,000 and €500,000; and the number with more than €500,000 at the National Assets Management Agency..
Minister for Finance, Michael Noonan: The National Asset Management Agency has no employees. Rather, under Section 42 of the NAMA Act 2009, the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) assigns staff to the Agency. As of end-October 2012, some 227 staff had been assigned by the NTMA to the Agency. The Agency reimburses the NTMA the costs incurred in assigning these staff and in providing other business and support services.
The legislation which established the NTMA in 1990 deliberately positioned it outside of the wider public service structures with the operational freedom to negotiate market-competitive salaries to enable it to compete with the private sector to attract and retain staff with specialist and highly marketable skills. Under this business model, there are no general pay grades and no pay scale and all staff are on individually negotiated contracts.
Other than a small number of staff reassigned from other functions within the NTMA, Agency staff are employed by the NTMA on the basis of specified purpose contracts – their employment lasts for as long as their particularly skills and experience are required. The total remuneration of NTMA staff assigned to the Agency, which is set out below in tabular format, reflects the fact that, given the nature of the Agency’s activities, this staffing complement is primarily composed of experienced professional staff with substantial private-sector experience. The total remuneration delineated below includes gross salary, employer pension contribution and, where applicable, other benefits. Agency staff members are subject to the Public Service Pension Deduction.
Total Remuneration Band Number
Under €100,000 108
Between €100,000 – €200,000 106
Between €201,000 – 300,000 9
Between €301,000 – €400,000 2
Between €401,000 – €500,000 1
> €501,000 1
Must be some team you got there,here is the entire US cabinet salary info.
With the exception of the President and Veep they all below 200,000 US …
The relatively modest or downright parsimonious in comparison to NAMA salary level of Tim Geitner,is cited as one the reasons he’s leaving.One of his potential successors is Larry Fink,who would have take a bit of a pay cut…
http://www.paywizard.org/main/VIPPaycheck/salaries-president-obamas-administration
http://dealbreaker.com/2012/11/bloomberg-worried-about-tim-geithners-ability-to-put-food-on-the-table/
of course what you fail to mention is that Geitner when he leaves will walk into a $10m pa sinecure – and thats excluding bonus and appearance fees!!!
Don’t think too many of the NAMA lads will do likewise.
The US Cabinet are politicians, who are always paid less, or if technocrats cash in mightily (on a Pharonic scale) before and/or after through connexions and the like. The NAMA people are businessmen for hire and need to be paid the market rate for their skils – but not, of course, a penny more.
I will add: my distress that NWL appears to be turning wholesale into a why-are-they-paid-so-much rant, admittedly better researched than the Indo, when this has little or nothing to do with solving our problems, much as it may draw the eyeballs.
@Otto, it would be remiss to omit the PQ on NAMA salaries including benefits and allowances. This information hasn’t appeared in the public domain before and indeed it raises an interesting question on Brendan McDonagh’s allowances if his actual salary is E365,500 but his package is >E500,000. The Oireachtas website omits the table and that is why there was a delay in publishing this blogpost.
Okay.
@John Murphy that’s why I linked the other piece….his most likely successor is Larry Fink, familiar to some in Ireland from the Balckrock stress tests.Taking a big hit in return for the glamour and prestige of serving his country.TG has stated numerous times that he does not want to work on the street but…
“He took more than a 50 percent pay cut to assume the job. His $199,700 salary is higher than the $174,000 earned by most members of Congress. His pay has been increased by $8,400 in three years, yet his net worth pales next to such predecessors as Hank Paulson and Bob Rubin. With two mortgages and two college-age children, the lure of private-sector money could be hard to resist. BlackRock’s Fink, for instance, received $23.8 million in salary and stock in 2011, making him No. 1 in the Finance 50, Bloomberg Markets’ annual ranking of the best-paid CEOs at the largest U.S. financial companies.”
link above.
Regarding x NAMA lads,pretty sure that old “FOX”,Ronan is doing quite nicely for himself with that humongous sovereign wealth fund from Abu Dubai,the ADIA that he joined….they still active in London then……….Fox was pretty high up at NAMA ,handling the UK wasn’t it,no restrictions or cooling off period huh..
“Only last week, Ronan Fox, a former senior asset manager at Nama, took up a new position as a real estate adviser with the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA). Prior to his departure from Nama, Mr Fox had been responsible for borrower repayment plans, asset strategy and managing the selling down of a distressed loan portfolio of some €6bn, according to his LinkedIn profile.
Mr Fox’s new employers, the ADIA, has shown a renewed interest in UK real estate, reportedly closing in on a deal to buy a portfolio of 42 Marriott hotels currently in administration.”
http://www.independent.ie/national-news/exec-quit-nama-because-of-state-interference-3244310.html
@otto this is debatable they are the MARKET,pretty crap negotiators as they are vastly over paying the help.
“The NAMA people are businessmen for hire and need to be paid the market rate for their skils”
Up to NAMA to set the pay scale in Ireland, do you think the market in Ireland for property professionals is that buoyant.The ‘reward’ is post NAMA..
Oh look….RBS has picked a buyer for Quinlan Private’s UK Marriott Portfolio…its its guess who………yep x NAMA Fox’s new shop,gosh imagine if when he was at NAMA he reviewed Quinlans business plans operating numbers and projections that be quite useful don’t ya think….probably worth a few bob extra to have that.
http://www.4hoteliers.com/4hots_nshw.php?mwi=8749
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-16/rbs-seen-picking-abu-dhabi-to-buy-42-hotels-property-week-says.html
“All complied but apparently the request contributed to the decision of NAMA’s Head of Lending, Graham Emmett to resign.” If this is true, then it does appear that something like the market salary is being offered, and, as I have said before, it is not necessarily a sign of the quality of personnel if internationally mobile hires leave.
@NWL
If a salary cap of €100,000 (including pensions) were put in place in the morning, how many NAMA staff would leave?
More importantly, would they be missed. I am quite sure that there are thousands of intelligent, able people who would the jobs these people are doing just as effectively on less than half the money being paid.
The bottom line is that a massive NAMA loss is on the way and the bonanza pay beneficiaries figure that they might as well milk the State for as much as the State allows itself to be milked.
The cute ones saw that very quickly.
NAMA is a gravy train, for staff, receivers, liquidators, valuers, property management people etc etc etc.
And I forget ‘primary servicer’. That must be one of the more obscure captions under which one hides obscenely high payments.
@NWL
Keep it up. Remember back in 1930s, a newly elected DeValera cut the pay of the PS with the comment ‘ no man is worth more than £1000 per year.’
I wonder what that translates to in today’s money.
If these people are worth so much, let them earn it in private industry.
Cut the pay and if they don’t like it then ‘don’t let the door hit them is the a** on the way out.
Here’s what 200 grand US gets you….Geitner live from the WSJ CEO conference hes on now,always interesting,some decent discussion’s later and tomorrow on the euro etc.
Some excellent speakers lined up its free and informative.
http://online.wsj.com/public/page/ceo_council.html
This website is so stupid and fails to contribute any progressive thought to current affairs. I am embarrassed to be Irish these days. FYI, their salaries are reasonable given their experience, skills and responsibilities. I do not work in NAMA nor do I have any affiliation with anybody in NAMA.
Please get off this website and get a job.
@Irish Realist
“I am embarrassed to be Irish these days”.
Me too.
Here’s Shelia Bair x head of the FDIC,recently on pay and performance,NAMA staff should have skin in the game.The article is about fixing congress but applicable to NAMA and also perhaps Irish politicians.
So Brendan at NAMA on 500,000 a year guaranteed is worth more than Geitner/Bernake combined ?
“Running a business and running a government are obviously different, but when it comes to compensation, government could probably learn a few things from well-managed corporations. Aligning pay with long-term performance can be a good way to change behavior for the better. We should give it a try.”
http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/06/congress-pay-performance/