• Home
  • NAMA property for sale
  • About
  • The Developers
  • The Tranches

NAMA Wine Lake

Click the green link above for latest news and over 2,600 related articles. NAMA – National Asset Management Agency – part of Ireland's response to its banking crisis and property bubble

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Ireland does not need a third pillar bank
NAMA funds work on shopping centre in Taoiseach’s back yard »

NAMA in €50m secret debt writeoff – report

September 4, 2012 by namawinelake

Greystones in Wicklow is lucky to have two deputies in the Dail who have proactively worked to see the stalled Habour project re-started and completed. Fine Gael’s Simon Harris and Independent TD, Stephen Donnelly have both been chivvying NAMA along so that the boarded-up eyesore at Greystones Harbour can be transformed into the mix of amenity park land and over 300 developed homes that was envisaged .

You might recall that a company called Sispar – which was a joint venture between developer Michael Cotter’s Park Homes and builder/developer Sisk – was developing the Habour site when the property bubble burst. Loans to the Sispar consortium were transferred to NAMA. There is now a report that NAMA has done a secret deal with Sisk which seemingly involves a major debt write-down.

The Sunday Independent last weekend carried a report on debonair developer, Michael Cotter and Irish construction giant, Sisk’s adventures in France where a yacht club they were developing together has gone pear-shaped apparently. Buried at the bottom of the report is a claim about an Irish development, that “NAMA is believed to have written down over €50m of debt attached to the blighted Greystones Harbour Development. The write-down is thought to be part of a secretive deal struck to allow building giant Sisk Group to take over the project”

The Sispar 2010 accounts had indicated the consortium had a €38m loan from AIB which was understood to have subsequently transferred to NAMA. Presumably this loan forms the lions-share of the “over €50m of debt” that the Sunday Independent reported is believed to have been written-down.

This “deal”, if confirmed, would raise a couple of concerns about the way in which NAMA conducts its business. Firstly, NAMA is proscribed by the NAMA Act from selling assets to defaulting debtors. Whilst Sisk is understood to have been servicing its share of the loan, both consortium partners were presumably jointly and severally liable for the full repayment of the loan. So, on what basis can NAMA have agreed to write-down the debt “to allow building giant Sisk Group to take over the project” when, if the loan were to be called in, Sisk would presumably have become liable for the lot and may even have become a defaulting debtor. Secondly, as with all secret deals, there is a concern that NAMA has failed to maximise the value of its loans. Might a third party have offered better terms to buy the loan and develop the Harbour? Who knows, who can tell, it’s secret.

As is usual with individual projects, NAMA is keeping schtum and not providing any comment.

Advertisement

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Banks, Developers, Irish population, NAMA, Non-Irish property, Politics | 3 Comments

3 Responses

  1. on September 4, 2012 at 12:30 pm Vince

    Forgive me but with all the hoo-haw you’d believe it was something with the importance of the port of Zeebrugge and not some piss-ant little mole that was built without one ounce of reason day one.


  2. on September 4, 2012 at 4:45 pm KarlMarcks (@KarlMarcks)

    It’s important, full stop.

    If NAMA has effectively forgiven €50 million of debt when it could have called in the loan, that is scandalous. Whatever about Park Developments, which is on its last legs, the Sisk Group is well-heeled and well able to pony up €50 million, or much more.

    Worse, if Sisk is now the sole owner and its debt forgiven, then it has effectively got its mitts on over 20 acres of reclaimed land and foreshore for absolutely nothing!

    The original PPP notion was that Sispar would finance the harbour, complete with 230-berth marina, five community clubhouses, and major new amenities in the form of a large public plaza and a public park, in return for this high-value development land.

    Now Sisk has the land, but its harbour debt has been cancelled.

    Meanwhile Greystones has a non-functioning harbour which only small boats which can be run up on shore can use — no berths or moorings whatever — and no facilities for the former commercial fishermen who have to operate from Dun Laoghaire or Bray (since 2007). There is no marina, no clubhouses have been built, there is no public access to most of the area, and visitors and tourists shy from the derelict site these predators have left behind.

    Daylight robbery, basically, and very damaging to the local economy.


  3. on September 4, 2012 at 5:59 pm KarlMarcks (@KarlMarcks)

    And to clarify, for the original author: Sisk and Park are, or were, indeed jointly and severally liable for Sispar’s debts. So you are right to say “Sisk would … have become liable for the lot”, whatever about “may even have become a defaulting debtor”.

    BTW, when Sispar announced this early in July, the same formula was used: A spokesperson from SISK stated that ‘NAMA, the SISK Group and Park Developments have reached an agreement which will result in the SISK Group acquiring Park’s interest in the project and the taking on full responsibility for the Project. One outcome of this agreement is that there will no longer be any debt owed to NAMA by Sispar in relation to the project.’

    So, either Sisk paid the debt or it was forgiven by NAMA. Can they do the latter?



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Posts

    • Test – 12 November 2018
    • Farewell from NWL
    • Happy 70th Birthday, Michael
    • Of the Week…
    • Noonan denies IBRC legal fees loan approval to Paddy McKillen was in breach of European Commission commitments
    • Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to be added as notice party in Sean Dunne’s bankruptcy
    • NAMA sues Maria Byrne and Graham Byrne in Dublin’s High Court
    • Johnny Ronan finally wins a court case
  • Recent Comments

    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Dorothy Jones on Of the Week…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Foody on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Frank Street on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    who_shot_the_tiger on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Brian Flanagan on Of the Week…
    Robert Browne on Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to b…
  • Twitter Updates

    Tweets by namawinelake
  • Click on date for that day’s posts

    September 2012
    M T W T F S S
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    « Aug   Oct »
  • Blog Stats

    • 5,119,697 hits

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Join 1,326 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: