• Home
  • NAMA property for sale
  • About
  • The Developers
  • The Tranches

NAMA Wine Lake

Click the green link above for latest news and over 2,600 related articles. NAMA – National Asset Management Agency – part of Ireland's response to its banking crisis and property bubble

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Finance minister provides details of NAMA’s decision-making for its first ghost estate demolition
Why is Minister Noonan not answering questions about NAMA’s dealings? »

Finance minister refuses to say why he unilaterally undermined Ireland’s financing position

July 4, 2012 by namawinelake

Tomorrow the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) is set to auction €500m of 3-month treasury bills in its much-heralded “return to the market”. Presently the Irish sovereign bond that is due to mature nine months hence in April 2013 is trading at 3.9% per annum on the secondary market. Industry sources think that tomorrow’s issuance might attract bidding at 2% per annum, which would probably be officially considered a very good result indeed.

One of the companies that operates under the NTMA umbrella is NAMA. And last week, NAMA announced that it had repaid €2bn of its senior debt – the “senior debt” is the €30bn of NAMA bonds or IOUs which NAMA used to purchase the €74bn of loans from the banks. What interest rate was NAMA paying on its senior debt? Minister Noonan recently reaffirmed that NAMA is paying the 6-month Euribor rate which is present 0.9%. Some people are asking what sort of Keystone cop tomfoolery is at play in the NTMA and the Department of Finance that we are seeking €500m of funding from treasury bills at 2% per annum when NAMA has a mountain of cash which it could lend at 0.9%.

Aah, I hear you say, NAMA was not set up to lend money to the Irish government. Well that little fiction was defenestrated in March 2012 when NAMA was directed by Minister Noonan to provide the €3bn finance to redeem the Anglo promissory note that the Government would otherwise have funded from borrowing. And the Direction issued by the Minister explicitly referenced NAMA’s primary objective of addressing the crisis in the Irish economy caused by the banking collapse, a crisis that four years later is still ongoing with the country in a double-dip recession and experiencing record 14.8% unemployment. So there was no obstacle on this account to prevent NAMA from providing a loan.

But what is preventing NAMA from making this financing available is the commitment given by Minister Noonan to the Troika in May 2012 that NAMA would repay €7.5bn of its senior debt by the end of 2013. This means that NAMA’s mountain of cash will quickly be depleted and won’t be available for other needs. The original NAMA scheme agreed with the EU was that the bonds would be redeemed by 2020 – 8.5 years hence. So what Minister Noonan agreed two months ago was a major concession.

The Sinn Fein finance spokesperson Pearse Doherty asked Minister for Finance Michael Noonan why he did it, and although he provided a response, he had no answer. This is the full exchange (with emphasis added)

“Deputy Pearse Doherty: To ask the Minister for Finance the consideration he gave to the concession added in the most recent Memorandum of Understanding On Specific Economic Policy Conditionality whereby the National Asset Management Agency is now required as a term of the bailout, to redeem €7.5bn of senior bonds by the end of 2013..

Minister for Finance, Michael Noonan: I can advise the Deputy that there were commitments on NAMA in previous Troika documentation. The May 2011 Memorandum of Understanding with the Troika included a target for the disposal of assets by NAMA by the end of 2013.

The NAMA Board had set a target of repaying €7.5bn of the NAMA Senior Bonds in issue by the end of 2013. In the most recent meetings with the Troika it was agreed that the Memorandum of Understanding be amended to align to this more appropriate, but closely related, target.

The debt repayment target is considered to be a more appropriate measure to monitor than asset disposals, which can be impacted by currency and other external factors. The Troika seek progress reports on the target at the quarterly meetings with NAMA.”

So tomorrow when the NTMA obtain three month €500m loans at about 2% per annum which will cost this State €2.5m in interest, remember that if NAMA had provided the lending at 0.9%, we would only be paying €1.2m, a saving of €1.3m.

The CEO of the NTMA, John Corrigan earns €490,000 per annum plus a bonus – in 2012 he is waiving 15% of his salary. John Moran, the Secretary General at the Department of Finance reputedly gets €200,000 per annum and Minister Noonan gets €170,000 – all excluding perks, expenses and benefits. And yet these highly rewarded individuals have signed away freedom of action for NAMA’s cash unilaterally and failed to get any concession in return.

Advertisement

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Banks, IMF, Irish economy, NAMA, Politics | 10 Comments

10 Responses

  1. on July 4, 2012 at 11:12 am Rob S

    “So tomorrow when the NTMA obtain three month €500m loans at about 2% per annum which will cost this State €2.5m in interest, remember that if NAMA had provided the lending at 0.9%, we would only be paying €1.2m, a saving of €1.3m.”

    I saw you posted this point on Irish Economy and forgive me for stating, what I feel, is obvious but do you not agree that the main purpose of the auction is not to actually raise revenue but to slowly show the world that we are easing our way back into the markets and all the reputational “goodwill” etc (which may not be quantifiable).

    Obivously one State Agency buying this bonds wouldn’t have this effect. Of course, you may argue that the buyers of these Bills might be Irish-owned banks and that there is no difference but that is obviously very difficult to confirm or deny.


    • on July 4, 2012 at 12:02 pm Kieran Sullivan

      What if those we’re trying to impress see this blog post and realise that Paddy has decided to pay 2% interest on a loan that he could have got for 0.9%.

      Its unlikely to convince them that we’ve learned our accountancy lesson.


      • on July 4, 2012 at 12:07 pm Rob S

        @Kieran

        Could it not be said that most countries have State-Owned instutuions (of some description) that are sitting on cash piles that could be used for this purpose yet they still undergo competitive auctions?

        I could be wrong of course.


  2. on July 4, 2012 at 11:41 am Yippee - We are back to the bond markets - Page 17

    […] […]


  3. on July 4, 2012 at 12:07 pm Seamus Coffey

    The point of the exercise is not to raise €500 million. Yesterday the NTMA said that there is €14,488 million in the Exchequer Account. Any like between this announcement and NAMA is tenuous at best. The move is about reengaging with private debt markets in a very limited fashion. No more, no less.


  4. on July 4, 2012 at 2:27 pm sf ca writer

    Showing goodwill to Shylock….
    WTF?
    ‘Here mugger take a tenner and mug me properly next time’.


  5. on July 4, 2012 at 7:35 pm Joseph Ryan

    @NWL

    There are two issues in the post:

    The biggest by far is the NAMA target to repay €7.5 billion. The ministers explanation is utterly unconvincing.
    This is deleveraging on steroids. Why is it being done?
    Why, if EZ banks are getting 3 year LTRO loans has NAMA (a residual bad bank) to pay funds back in a little over one year?

    What is the deleveraging criteria for the German bad bank:
    FMS Wertmanagement
    http://news.malaysia.msn.com/business/german-bad-bank-of-hre-posts-big-2011-loss-3.

    Deleveraging is destroying the economy faster than any austerity measures.
    Is this repayment ‘target’ the reason that NAMA properties are being allowed to ‘fall into disrepair’. The reason that the wrecking ball was moved into Longford a few weeks ago.

    Longford is probably a quiet place to move to start the wrecking machine.

    Somebody should remind NAMA (and the minister) that they are an asset management agency, not a debt collection agency for the ECB, while acting as a NADA (National Asset Destruction Agency).

    There are huge numbers of partially completed properties, both commercial and residential, that could be completed in circumstances where the revenue exceeds the cost of completion.

    On the issue of treasury bills, I remain unconvinced by the toe in water argument. It is a very expensive way to dip one’s toe in the water.
    You calculate the toe-dip to have cost the State 1.3 billion that it need no have spent.
    Add in fees etc and the true cost is greater.

    The people making the decisions must have very well manicured toes.
    It a pity they do pay for the manicuring themselves.


  6. on July 4, 2012 at 9:22 pm Joseph Ryan

    “You calculate the toe-dip to have cost the State 1.3 billion that it need no have spent.”

    My mistake.That should have been 1.3 million.
    Still a hell of a toe-job


  7. on July 5, 2012 at 3:12 pm Kieran Sullivan

    In the Dail today, Ruairi Quinn may have inadvertently let slip a major reason for apparently destitute Ireland paying out over €1m it didn’t have to.

    In response to being interrupted by Mary Lou McDonald, Mr. Quinn said, “You can’t even accept good news, God love you.” The Minister for Education then added “you’re really pathetic.”

    Gleefully reported at: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2012/0705/breaking21.html


  8. on July 6, 2012 at 3:16 pm Northern Ireland court case sheds light on Irish banks lending practices during the boom | Machholz's Blog

    […] Finance minister refuses to say why he unilaterally undermined Ireland’s financing position (namawinelake.wordpress.com) Rate this:Share this:EmailPrintRedditMoreFacebookTwitterPinterestTumblrDiggStumbleUponLinkedInLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. […]



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Posts

    • Test – 12 November 2018
    • Farewell from NWL
    • Happy 70th Birthday, Michael
    • Of the Week…
    • Noonan denies IBRC legal fees loan approval to Paddy McKillen was in breach of European Commission commitments
    • Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to be added as notice party in Sean Dunne’s bankruptcy
    • NAMA sues Maria Byrne and Graham Byrne in Dublin’s High Court
    • Johnny Ronan finally wins a court case
  • Recent Comments

    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Dorothy Jones on Of the Week…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Foody on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Frank Street on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    who_shot_the_tiger on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Brian Flanagan on Of the Week…
    Robert Browne on Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to b…
  • Twitter Updates

    Tweets by namawinelake
  • Click on date for that day’s posts

    July 2012
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
    « Jun   Aug »
  • Blog Stats

    • 5,119,387 hits

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Join 1,326 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: