• Home
  • NAMA property for sale
  • About
  • The Developers
  • The Tranches

NAMA Wine Lake

Click the green link above for latest news and over 2,600 related articles. NAMA – National Asset Management Agency – part of Ireland's response to its banking crisis and property bubble

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« NAMA’s secret debt forgiveness programme
NAMA renews appointment of Northern Ireland duo to NAMA advisory committee »

ESRI publishes commentary on current Irish residential property market

June 18, 2012 by namawinelake

Fresh from covering itself in poop last week when it took the “unprecedented” step of removing from its website, a working paper which showed that a significant number of Irish households would be better off on benefits, Frances Ruane’s government-funded ESRI this morning published its quarterly economic forecast. Often an outlier when it comes to projections, this mornings publication is very much in line with recent government forecasts with GDP forecast at (with last February’s forecast in brackets) 0.6% in 2012 (0.9%) and 2.2% in 2013 (2.3%) and GNP forecast at 0% for 2012 (0.1%) and 0.5% for 2013 (1.0%). Of course, none of us has a crystal ball but it is difficult to see, with ongoing difficulty in the UK, the rest of Europe and the US, how we will have GDP growth this year, and I would not be surprised if the Central Bank of Ireland quarterly outlook report due in July 2012 reflected that.

On Friday last, we had a bit of a laugh at Mark Fitzgerald of Sherry Fitzgerald’s musings on the recent Moody’s assessment of Irish property. Who knows if the Fitzgeralds enjoy a Sunday dinner together, but today, Mark’s brother John Fitzgerald and another ESRI researcher, David Duffy published a special report on the Irish housing market, in particular supply and demand, which makes the simple points that the over-construction in the last decade was more pronounced in some areas than others, and that in Dublin today, although the vacancy level is still above that in 2002, there is closer matching between supply and demand.

There is little reference to the availability of credit or construction costs or indeed very little on emigration, which almost criminally for a country historically scourged by emigration, is not routinely accurately monitored by either the CSO or the ESRI. However the conclusion is that we will need about 20,000 dwellings per annum to cope with household formation until 2015 even after “assuming significant emigration”, though there is little information given on what assumptions were made. Somewhere in Sussex, an hirsute Dutchman is choking on his chips with mayonnaise!

Somehow – and perhaps this is hypersensitivity – I get the impression the report wants to suggest an imminent flattening and rebound in prices. Its conclusion that the large numbers who have started renting since the 2006 Census may switch to buying seems to ignore what might perhaps be a just-as-likely possibility of renting numbers growing as existing households escape from under-water mortgages and contemplate an economy where it is expected we will still have 12%-plus unemployment in 2015. And the wording used in the conclusion – “when expectations change it is likely that the recent sharp fall in house prices will be halted” – is odd, given the recent two-month-running increase in prices in Dublin, does the ESRI that expectations have now changed because the “recent sharp fall” has “halted”, at least for two months running? Would have been great to be a fly on the wall during the dessert course at the Fitzgeraldses yesterday.

 

And lastly, for all the flak that was directed, by the ESRI and others, at the trio who produced the working paper “the cost of working” which was removed by the ESRI last week, today’s publication tells us that in 2001 Ireland had “total dwellings per thousand adult population” of 467 and “occupied dwellings per thousand adult population” of 467 also. Elsewhere the report says that there was an Irish vacancy rate of 9.8% in 2002 which seems reasonable. Never mind “peer review” just a common-sense second pair of eyes might have picked up on that clanger.

Advertisement

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Irish economy, Irish Property, Politics, vacant property | 12 Comments

12 Responses

  1. on June 18, 2012 at 3:50 pm John Foody

    One thing there seems to be very little written on is ‘fear of borrowing’. Those first time buyers out there now, have friends, older brothers/sisters, parents and relatives who have seen their quality of life and freedom of movement savaged by getting a mortgage.

    They also live in a time where there’s a cloud of uncertainty over the solvency of the country and consequently the future quality of life on the island.

    These are compelling reasons not to buy and that’s before you consider direct taxes coming the way of property owners, removable of mortgage interest (among others) relief, likelihood of higher interests rates in the medium term, disgusting levels of unemployment, emigration, likelihood of ghetto-ization of some areas, low investment in local amenities and infrastructure, strong potential for future foreclosures, over supply, some banks unwillingness to lend more than 80% for some classes of property (eg 1 bed apartments Dublin City centre).

    And that’s before you consider we have the highest child care costs in Europe, high energy costs, below average public transport facilities, though above average roads, high taxes on cars (direct and indirect), soon to be above average 3rd level education costs, above average medical and food costs.

    And don’t get me started on the weather!

    In terms of first time buyer profile (the supposed engine of any property market), you’re basically left with young couples in the higher paid NMCs, semi-state and state permenant jobs, who haven’t already bought. Which cant be a huge number of people considering there’s a recruitment ban in place in the latter.


  2. on June 18, 2012 at 4:35 pm Niall

    @ NWL there is a very interesting piece by Dr. Peter Lunn entitled “The Impact of Recession on Migration: A Preliminary Analysis of Census 2011” on page 52, which raises quite a few issues, which may impact long-term on the housing market and well worth reading

    In particular “Members of the long-term native Irish population in their twenties in 2011 were substantial net emigrants; especially (but far from exclusively) the men. Between 2006 and 2011, almost 40,000 more of them left the country than arrived, equivalent to 10 per cent of men and 5 per cent of women aged 20-29 years. Note that this does not equate to one-in-ten
    men and one-in-twenty women in this group emigrating during the period,
    because the figures correspond to net migration and are thus reduced by any immigration for this cohort. Thus, substantially more than one-in-ten and one-in twenty emigrated.” (pages 58-59)


  3. on June 18, 2012 at 6:21 pm John Foody

    @Niall

    Well spotted. Page 22 of the below PDF has a graph on that.

    Click to access RN20120203.pdf

    It looks like the establishments fu*k the young policy policy is succeeding.

    ‘Recent years have seen marked differences too between people of different ethnicity. In the White-Irish category, those aged 20-29 were significant net emigrants over the five year intercensal period, in contrast to any other age group of any other ethnicity. Within this native ethnic group in their twenties, more than one-in-ten men and one-in-twenty women emigrated between 2006 and 2011’


    • on June 19, 2012 at 9:27 am Niall

      @ John Rather many Irish people are unwilling to take up the employment that is available. Why else is there continued high levels of migration to the State? Someone arriving here has no entitlement to SW payments so must therefore work!


  4. on June 18, 2012 at 10:03 pm Jacek

    How it is possible?
    More and more people are leaving (back home or emigrating) and rents are actually going up or are still the same?

    Who is paying for that empties? They don’t want to cut rent by 200E/month, but in the same year apt is laying empty for month or two.. or more depending on district. Crazy economics. It is obvious that math wasn’t important on their economic studies.


  5. on June 19, 2012 at 12:09 am What Goes Up...

    Ahhhhhhhhh…. David “In many cases negative equity will not be an issue” Duffy.

    http://www.thepropertypin.com/viewtopic.php?p=307474#p307474

    Yet in the report we get:

    Finally, the depth and duration of the crisis, in addition to widespread negative equity means it is possible the crisis will have changed the perceived attractiveness of the rental tenure choice.

    So David… This one’s for free – Negative Equity matters!

    Negative Equity is the amortization of the misappropriation of capital.

    Print it out.

    Put on your desk.

    Smash head on desk repeatedly until memorised.


  6. on June 19, 2012 at 7:35 am Gregory Connor

    I read the Duffy-Fitzgerald paper quite carefully (I am working on some distantly related research) and although I personally am quite pessimistic about Irish property markets I do think you were a bit over-sensitive in your description of the claims in the paper. The paper seemed quite measured and balanced to me. I would not be surprised by continued big falls in Irish property prices (“big” from the perspective of the lower current base — e.g. an additional 20% fall from peak requires a 50% fall from current base if prices have already fallen perhaps 60%). Anyway the paper did not make any specific price change forecast or market timing call, it was very clear on that, and provided lots of useful info. Prices perhaps might wiggle a bit with a dead-cat-bounce increase and then later stagnate. They do not claim they can predict the timing or direction but give info on demographics and rental/owner cohorts.


    • on June 19, 2012 at 8:05 am namawinelake

      @Gregory,

      I respectfully disagree with you.

      And here’s the evidence.

      “Shortage of houses for under 35s in Irish cities to spark price surge”

      http://www.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/shortage-of-houses-for-under-35s-in-irish-cities-to-spark-price-surge-3143917.html

      The ESRI took a partial position in deciding that the increase in renters post-2006 was a temporary blip and would reverse as soon as “expectations” change. An equally plausible hypothesis is that the renting cohort will grow with uncertainty and the legacy of burnt fingers on property and mortgages.


  7. on June 19, 2012 at 9:18 am Gregory Connor

    That is the problem with the Independent Newspaper more than specifically with the ESRI report. The Indo has a strong financial interest (and other newspapers) in pushing property since their advertising revenue is heavily dependent upon real estate agency good will toward them. That biases their reporting. So they take the ESRI and Central Bank reports (plus the real estate industries own “research” propaganda) and distort it toward their paymasters. The Irish Times and other papers have the same problem — I think that this bias is currently worst at the Indo, just my humble opinion from casual reading.


    • on June 19, 2012 at 10:21 am namawinelake

      @Gregory, no disagreement there at all. Though let’s be honest, it is in the interest of the economy generally, not just newspapers, that we have competitively priced housing gently rising in price, which in turn promotes confidence and spending. Even potential buyers benefit because they will see their new purchases rising in price. So we can all get irritated by newspaper reporting which leaps on any sign at all that house prices are stable or rising, but in truth it benefits most of us as long as prices are rising from a competitive base, which arguably they are not presently because of the lack of equilibrium between supply and demand, the distorting behaviour of lenders/legal system and a lack of transparency in pricing.

      The ESRI report however gave the greenlight to the type of article penned by Charlie in the Independent, because the adopted assumption was that the post-2006 doubling in the renting cohort was a blip.

      And as noted above, the converse of “when expectations change it is likely that the recent sharp fall in house prices will be halted” is that “when the recent sharp fall in house prices is halted there will be a change in expectations” and given that Dublin prices have stopped dropping according to the two most recent CSO monthly index reports, it seems to me that the ESRI is saying “expectations will now change”.

      Lastly, I am open to accusations of hypersensitivity with the above, but in themselves these points seem valid.


      • on June 21, 2012 at 12:26 am Frank H

        Thanks for the great blog @namawinelake though I agree with @Gregory on this one.

        I read the Independent piece first and then the ESRI research. In my view, the cautious and relatively vague ESRI conclusions were completely distorted by Charlie Weston. Were the authors happy for them to be? Who knows. I doubt it. Should they have anticipated the front page? Based on that newspaper’s past and recent form, yes.


  8. on June 19, 2012 at 12:50 pm Ahura M

    My problem with ESRI reports is that I tend to forget their detail before they are shown to be wrong.

    I don’t remember John or the ESRI issue dire reports on the property bubble; so they perhaps should explain this before making further comment on the property market.

    Sometimes google helps. And in this case I’ve found an Irish Indo article attack RTE’s Future shock Property Crash programme. It seems John Fitz was pretty clueless.

    http://www.independent.ie/unsorted/property/future-shock-property-crash-the-reaction-44341.html

    “However, the lack of balance used by the programme editors means that Alan Aherne, who was negative, was given a lot more airtime than say Pat McArdle or John FitzGerald. Was this because the views of the latter two authorities did not coincide with the main thrust of the programme’s title?

    John FitzGerald (ESRI economist) stated that if he believed there was a crash coming that he would sell his house and rent it back. Tellingly he is not doing so because he believes, as I do, that if (and that is a big ‘if’) the market is going to crash it will do so in a patchy, selective way which will not impact to any great degree on many of the existing homes in Ireland.
    “



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Posts

    • Test – 12 November 2018
    • Farewell from NWL
    • Happy 70th Birthday, Michael
    • Of the Week…
    • Noonan denies IBRC legal fees loan approval to Paddy McKillen was in breach of European Commission commitments
    • Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to be added as notice party in Sean Dunne’s bankruptcy
    • NAMA sues Maria Byrne and Graham Byrne in Dublin’s High Court
    • Johnny Ronan finally wins a court case
  • Recent Comments

    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Dorothy Jones on Of the Week…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Foody on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Frank Street on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    who_shot_the_tiger on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Brian Flanagan on Of the Week…
    Robert Browne on Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to b…
  • Twitter Updates

    • Funniest case in Irish legal history? 1. ex-Cllr Fred Forsey convicted of RECEIVING a corrupt payment 2. developer… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Really looking forward to this at 9pm tonight, esp the first Garda on the scene. Well worth reading this background… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Tea time on the day the president of the ECB tells us we [in Ireland] are paying more interest on our loans than th… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • “I am grateful for you to refer to Mr Sugarman...on the specific question of Unicredit, responsibility at ECB lies… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • @JMcGuinnessTD now confronts ECB about "the honest whistleblower" @WhistleIRL and his disclosures of liquidity issu… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Details, including court documents of class action in New York against Ryanair and CEO Michael O'Leary.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Draghi tells @paulmurphy_TD the ECB doesn't remove govts, the people do, that's democracy. Bet the people will be m… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Wow! Draghi says there is no net interest cost for the Anglo bonds whilst they're held by the Irish central bank. T… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    Follow @namawinelake
  • Click on date for that day’s posts

    June 2012
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  
    « May   Jul »
  • Blog Stats

    • 5,113,856 hits

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Join 1,326 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: