• Home
  • NAMA property for sale
  • About
  • The Developers
  • The Tranches

NAMA Wine Lake

Click the green link above for latest news and over 2,600 related articles. NAMA – National Asset Management Agency – part of Ireland's response to its banking crisis and property bubble

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« NAMA explains how it accounts for interest income
Allsop Space auction today – flash results and analysis »

Why you should take anything that comes out of Ireland’s Department of Finance with a pinch of salt.

March 1, 2012 by namawinelake

When the new Minister for Finance, Michael Noonan eventually got his feet under the desk at the Department of Finance after winning the General Election a year ago, he was presented with briefing notes by his Secretary General, Kevin Cardiff. The briefing notes – with heavy redactions – were released and it was striking that objective number one for the Department was to exude confidence in Ireland’s economy. This is the extract:

Since February 2011, we have witnessed the fiasco of the Department of Finance getting the calculation of the General Government Debt statistic wrong to the tune of €3.6bn (actually €3.719bn). We’ve witnessed the subsequent fiasco of an investigation under the auspices of the Secretary General whose Department made the mistake, and four months after the mistake was uncovered, we are still waiting on the results of the two investigations into how Employee A in the NTMA communication to Employee B in the Department of Finance wasn’t acted upon or escalated when it became clear it wasn’t being acted on.

But the Department of Finance has found the time to curiously stick its toes into an area which you might have expected to have been the preserve of the Central Bank of Ireland– reporting on deposits in Irish banks. The Department first issued a presentation in October 2011 in which it claimed that deposits in Irish banks were picking up momentum – “retail deposits have seen some momentum in September following the stabilization of the banks and their recapitalization, but it was last month 2012 that the Department started producing a monthly publication on “deposit trends” in Irish banks. Neither the Department nor the CBI has explained why it is the Department that is producing this information, and not the Bank. And the Department is not reconciling its figures with the monthly figures produced by the CBI, but says in general terms the differences are down to overseas deposits and “consolidation differences”.

The problem is that the Department is trumpeting its figures as evidence that confidence is returning to Irish banks and that the deposit position in Irish banks is improving after three years of turbulence. Last month the Department said that deposits at Irish banks had improved by €7bn or 4% in the last six months of 2011. Which is very impressive indeed. The Department declined to say how much of this was due to deposits in overseas branches of Irish banks, but thanks to a slide buried in a Department presentation that originally seems prepared for the Troika, we get the following:

 

So we see that even though deposits overall at the Irish covered banks increased by €6.8bn in the last six months of 2011, deposits in Ireland at Irish covered banks actually decreased by €0.2bn. So the increase in deposits has been entirely down to overseas branches of the covered banks increasing their deposits. It is indeed hard to see how Bank of Ireland’s €19bn of UK deposits has any impact on the Irish economy.UK retail deposits are covered by a GBP 100,000 guarantee from theUK government and it is not clear howUK deposits can promote lending inIreland.

But what is mostly unsettling is the Department of Finance plainly has access to the overseas deposit information – it produced it for its presentation to the Troika – but that it declines to draw attention to it domestically. Is it this Department of Finance that is prompting Government back-benchers to claim that “deposits are flowing back” into Irish banks?

The Department published its second “deposits trends” report yesterday and says deposits rose by €0.2bn in January 2012. You can read the report here but you might want to get your grain of salt first.

Advertisement

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Banks, IMF, Irish economy, Politics | 9 Comments

9 Responses

  1. on March 1, 2012 at 3:36 pm Rob S

    @NWL

    I hope you aren’t suggetsing the 3.6bn was deliberately hidden for such purposes!

    Regarding the deposits, it is getting confusing I have to admit – trying to keep track and reconcile the two different sets of figures coming from the DoF and CBI.

    However:

    “It is indeed hard to see how Bank of Ireland’s €19bn of UK deposits has any impact on the Irish economy”

    Over the last year or so as deposits left Irish banks in their droves before stabilsiing (to an extent!), do you not think it important that BoI (and all the covered banks) can reassure potenital depositors that they do have overseas sources of funding to offset any weaknesses in the domestic deposit situation?

    I mean, is it wrong to be reassured, if you are a BoI customer, that the bank has a huge number of deposits in the UK?


  2. on March 1, 2012 at 3:39 pm Rob S

    Whilst we are at it, what do you think of the European Commission’s new narrow definition of Irish banks when talking about deposits?

    “Deposit outflows from domestically-owned banks (henceforth, “PCAR” banks)5 appear to have stabilised.”

    Click to access ocp93_en.pdf

    PAGE 6


  3. on March 1, 2012 at 5:35 pm Kieran Sullivan

    Great work again NWL.

    It’s just more chest-puffing and bravado from the most insecure yet over confident men in the land.

    @Rob S
    Of course it’s good for BoI customers to know the bank has large deposits elsewhere. But that wasn’t the key point the Dept. of Finance were trying to get across.


  4. on March 1, 2012 at 6:13 pm Rob S

    @Kieran Sullivan

    Isn’t it?

    They are trying (essentially) to reassure people that there is no need to move your deposits from a covered bank to a non-covered bank.

    Obviously there is some implicit suggestion that perhaps deposits stabilising or slightly increasing is a direct result of an improvement in the wider economy but I can see some logic in the decision to publish these figures even if the CB should be doing it.


  5. on March 1, 2012 at 6:50 pm Conan Drumm

    I can see some logic in the decision to publish these figures even if the CB should be doing it.

    Be very afraid when an arm of the State susceptible to political influence takes on a reporting function that should be rigorously maintained at arms length by an independent agency. We’re in the mess we’re in because this independence was whittled away under previous administrations.


  6. on March 1, 2012 at 6:57 pm Jake Watts

    One think to take into consideration when making a decision regarding the safety of Irish bank deposits is the health of the overall Euro banking system. I would suggest that it is less than sanguine. And, it looks very much like the torrents of liquidity flowing out the the LTRO “project” respired their last breath.

    *Bank of Ireland PLC: Tapped the LTRO in December and will likely do so again at the next opportunity, chief executive Richie Boucher said in a Wall Street Journal report Feb 20.
    http://blogs.wsj.com/eurocrisis/2012/02/27/at-a-glance-banks-ponder-second-ltro/

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/01/us-ecb-weidmann-idUSTRE82010G20120301?feedType=RSS&sp=true


  7. on March 1, 2012 at 7:18 pm Rob S

    @Conan

    Well don’t confuse me seeing some logic in publishing them for actually thinking the DoF should be the ones doing it.

    Or perhaps your ‘be afraid’ message was general.


  8. on March 1, 2012 at 8:36 pm Bunbury

    Great Sherlock Holmes work again NWL. Apologies for continually beating this drum but isn’t this the type of analysis that should have its natural home on Irisheconomy.ie if that blog was truly doing its function? I’m not complaining because if I were allowed access only one website or blog to keep up to date with the Irish economy then NWL would be the choice. You’re worth your weight in economists!


    • on March 2, 2012 at 12:37 am gerhard dengler

      I couldn’t agree more, Bunbury.

      This site explains the issues in a simple straightforward way so that the great unwashed such as myself can readily understand the issues.
      And the input from the various comments makes for very interesting reading.

      NWL is doing a great service to all by providing this blog.



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Posts

    • Test – 12 November 2018
    • Farewell from NWL
    • Happy 70th Birthday, Michael
    • Of the Week…
    • Noonan denies IBRC legal fees loan approval to Paddy McKillen was in breach of European Commission commitments
    • Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to be added as notice party in Sean Dunne’s bankruptcy
    • NAMA sues Maria Byrne and Graham Byrne in Dublin’s High Court
    • Johnny Ronan finally wins a court case
  • Recent Comments

    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Dorothy Jones on Of the Week…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Foody on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Frank Street on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    who_shot_the_tiger on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Brian Flanagan on Of the Week…
    Robert Browne on Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to b…
  • Twitter Updates

    • Funniest case in Irish legal history? 1. ex-Cllr Fred Forsey convicted of RECEIVING a corrupt payment 2. developer… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Really looking forward to this at 9pm tonight, esp the first Garda on the scene. Well worth reading this background… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Tea time on the day the president of the ECB tells us we [in Ireland] are paying more interest on our loans than th… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • “I am grateful for you to refer to Mr Sugarman...on the specific question of Unicredit, responsibility at ECB lies… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • @JMcGuinnessTD now confronts ECB about "the honest whistleblower" @WhistleIRL and his disclosures of liquidity issu… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Details, including court documents of class action in New York against Ryanair and CEO Michael O'Leary.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Draghi tells @paulmurphy_TD the ECB doesn't remove govts, the people do, that's democracy. Bet the people will be m… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Wow! Draghi says there is no net interest cost for the Anglo bonds whilst they're held by the Irish central bank. T… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    Follow @namawinelake
  • Click on date for that day’s posts

    March 2012
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
    « Feb   Apr »
  • Blog Stats

    • 5,116,381 hits

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Join 1,326 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: