• Home
  • NAMA property for sale
  • About
  • The Developers
  • The Tranches

NAMA Wine Lake

Click the green link above for latest news and over 2,600 related articles. NAMA – National Asset Management Agency – part of Ireland's response to its banking crisis and property bubble

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Should we be getting worried at NAMA’s financial performance?
“Jaysus, is there no end to the Liam Carroll apartments in Castleforbes Square” – the Allsop Space catalogue for the March 2012 auction is published »

Did NAMA place 800 BSkyB jobs in jeopardy, before Government minister intervened?

February 4, 2012 by namawinelake

Earlier this week, it was confirmed that satellite TV broadcaster BSkyB is to create up to 800 new jobs in a Dublin call-centre operation which will provide support to the company’s 10.5m subscribers throughout Ireland and Britain. Wonderful news for Ireland which has over 300,000 unemployed or a 14.2% unemployment rate, and nearly 440,000 on the Live Register. BSkyB’s call centre operation will be based at Plaza 1,Burlington Plaza on Burlington Road in Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 where it is understood the company is taking 35,000 sq ft of accommodation in a building which has over 150,000 sq ft overall. So far, so good – nothing to see here.

But it seems that the creation of the call centre and the jobs was almost scuppered by NAMA. Why? Because the building atBurlingtonPlazais understood to be controlled by NAMA as a result of loans acquired from AIB. The building has 164,533 sq ft and is presently being marketed for rent by Jones Lang LaSalle. BSkyB only wanted to rent part of the building, but NAMA wanted to hold out and try to rent the building as a whole to one tenant. So NAMA apparently vetoed the letting of the 35,000 sq ft to BSkyB.

NowBurlingtonPlazais only one of five building in centralDublinwith over 100,000 sq ft of accommodation available for letting, so it might be that NAMA thought it might maximise its return on the building if it was let at a premium to a company that might have been looking for a large centralDublinoffice. But in rejecting the BSkyB deal, the Agency was (a) turning down immediate business and (b) was placing the creation of 800 jobs in jeopardy.

And had it not been for the apparent intervention by Minister for Jobs, Innovation and Employment, Richard Bruton, there the matter might have lay. But it seems the Minister was coaxed into telephoning the NAMA CEO, Brendan McDonagh. We don’t yet know what was said during the conversation, but the immediate aftermath saw NAMA change its position on the approach from BSkyB and agreement was given for the part-letting of the building.

This is not the first time that NAMA has come in for criticism and accusations of stymieing business and employment. BBC Northern Ireland’s Spotlight programme broadcast in November 2011, made a similar charge.

Neither NAMA nor the Department of Jobs Innovation and Employment has commented on the matter. With 14.2% unemployment, no-one is going to criticise the Minister but it is curious that he hasn’t made his apparent intervention public as required by the NAMA anti-lobbying rules…

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Banks, Irish economy, NAMA, Northern Ireland, Politics | 19 Comments

19 Responses

  1. on February 4, 2012 at 10:41 pm who_shot_the_tiger

    Where is the anger!

    70,000 people emigrating this year and every year for the foreseeable future, 450,000 on the dole and these people living in their ivory towers immune from it all and allowing 800 more leave.

    It is irrelevant whether the building is let to one tenant or three tenants. What matters is the jobs for our people. Where is their moral compass and where is our anger!

    When will they be replaced by someone with commercial nous? When will our politicians take charge of this cesspit at the heart of our domestic economy?


    • on February 6, 2012 at 8:01 am The Fuzz

      Sorry but I am going to have to nitpick a wee bit here, many people mention this 70,000 figure but it’s a bit tabloid for my taste and totally dismisses immigration. The net figure is 34,500 and if you take non-nationals out of the equation then it is only 23,000. Admittedly this is about the worst figure since 1987 ish so it is definitely a thing to be looking at but 23,000 is a long cry from 70,000 emigrating every year.
      Personally I don’t have a problem with people leaving Ireland (living in Canada and waiting for the house prices to drop myself) and I was never too sure why people got upset about it. Brain drain seems to be one of the more common reasons for not wanting it to happen but I can guarantee ya there’s plenty of thick feckers emigrate as well so I don’t buy that. Can anyone explain to me why emigration is a bad thing and what harm it has done Ireland in the past?? Apart from it being a damning indicator of the state of the economy and outlook in Ireland….

      Click to access Population%20and%20Migration%20Estimates%20April%202011.pdf


      • on February 6, 2012 at 8:46 am namawinelake

        @The Fuzz, you might be interested in this two-part post on emigration, and why it is historically unique to Ireland

        https://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2011/08/01/is-there-any-hope-for-the-country/

        https://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/the-departed-part-2/


  2. on February 5, 2012 at 4:25 am OMF

    Well, if they were a Nama consultant getting paid €765 an hour for holding out for a full tenant, you can see why someone would be reluctant to rent the building at all!

    I think that, owing to the size of their remuneration, the boys at Nama are still living at some time in 2006. They probably think that there is a queue of Music stores and architectural firms lined up outside the door waiting to rent the place.

    I’d describe Nama not as living in an Ivory Tower, but up in the clouds altogether.


  3. on February 5, 2012 at 9:02 am Patrick

    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/nama-treating-developers-like-dirt-says-furious-agar-3010367.html


  4. on February 5, 2012 at 9:49 am What Goes Up...

    Oooooooooooh….. Richard Bruton kicking ass…

    Looks like you’re part of the government spin machine now!

    Whoever gave you the heads -up on the SKY deal really wants that story out there.

    The Sunday Independent running the same thing on the web and in print today:

    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/how-nama-risked-800-sky-jobs-3010378.html


    • on February 5, 2012 at 9:55 am namawinelake

      @WGU, part of the government spin machine? (1) His department didn’t respond to a request for comment and (2) the blogpost above poses a serious question about Minister Bruton’s behaviour in the context of NAMA’s anti-lobbying rules.


      • on February 5, 2012 at 10:37 am What Goes Up...

        The Indo article is nothing but a hagiography to Richard “Jobs” Bruton:

        The Sunday Independent has learned from highly placed government sources that Mr Bruton was deeply concerned when he became aware of the issue and the growing obstacle it presented to job creation in a series of contracts from Sky.

        Shocked by Nama’s apparent intransigence, Mr Bruton immediately contacted the IDA’s chief executive, Barry O’Leary, to express his displeasure and to insist that “everything possible would be done” to secure the Sky jobs. Asked if the minister had contacted Nama directly, one informed source close to the matter said: “Richard didn’t contact Nama directly. It was made clear to Nama through the appropriate channels, however, that he was absolutely determined that everything possible should be done so that these jobs would come to Dublin.

        “Richard was absolutely engaged with this from the moment [Sky director] Mark Deering approached his department early last summer.”

        Asked what channels Mr Bruton had gone through to inform Nama of his views, the source said: “He made a number of calls. His first call was to Barry O’Leary at the IDA. He called Barry and asked ‘what’s going on here?’.”

        Commenting on the impact of Mr Bruton’s eleventh-hour intervention, a separate source close to the negotiations with Sky said that Nama’s position changed “overnight”.

        His department may not have responded to a request for comment – but they probably smiled internally.

        As for being seen to be illegally directly/indirectly “lobbying” NAMA or being seen to be The Minister For jobs fighting for Ireland… well, he’s only a Gombeen Irish politician who failed miserably in his putsch against a paperweight party leader – you have to allow him his little victories.

        The Indo article has tried to cover the lobbying issue by saying it was via the IDA – so he obviously got your questions… he just chose to “answer” them via favoured journalists.


  5. on February 5, 2012 at 11:44 am paddy19

    This is classic free market spin. If NAMA was private sector landlord nobody would expect it to have a role in job creation but once it’s government owned its job becomes confused in free marketers minds.

    Is it supposed to create jobs or optimise returns?

    I thought the IDA/EI owned job creation.

    Are you suggesting NWL that NAMA’s role should now be job creation?


  6. on February 5, 2012 at 11:55 am who_shot_the_tiger

    @paddy19, It should factor in job creation. It’s better to rent a factory for €2 per sq. ft. and create some jobs and employment than leave it empty. NAMA reminds me of those still looking for the 2006 price of €1 million for the house, when the going rate is now €350,000.


    • on February 6, 2012 at 1:04 pm paddy19

      @ who_shot_the_tiger

      Once you start asking NAMA to factor other factors in like jobs or poor areas or regional development it will loose it’s focus on getting the best return for the taxpayer.

      One standard for the private sector…make a profit.

      Different standard for the public sector…. solve all society’s ills.

      Nobody expects McDonalds to manage their customers health or Guinness to worry about alcoholism so why should NAMA get saddled with creating jobs.

      Let the IDA/EI create jobs. They get well paid for it.

      It’s Ireland’s curse that we keep confusing roles and responsibilities

      .. the bank regulator was supposed to supervise the banks but also wear the green jersey……

      ….the National Consumer Agency was to supposed to protect consumers and educate merchants in consumer law….

      ….schools are supposed to educate children but are expected to fix every social problem from booze to sex…

      Let NAMA create money. It’s got enough on it’s plate without loading it with social responsibility.


      • on February 6, 2012 at 3:14 pm who_shot_the_tiger

        @paddy19,
        I’ve watched NAMA…. up close and personal. The people that work there are incapable of making a profit. It’s not part of their psyche or genetic DNA. They are civil servants with a CAB mentality. They are just interested in expedient sales of low hanging mainly income producing assets. They see their role in a narrow perspective, one that is mainly personal, retributional and vindictive. It is a negative perspective that ignores the wider interests of the economy that relate to jobs and growth.

        In my opinion, the NAMA Act does not exclude the wider interests of the State as stated in Clause 10, viz:

        10.(1) NAMA’s purposes shall be to contribute to the achievement of the purposes specified in section 2 by

        (a) the acquisition from participating institutions of such eligible bank assets as is appropriate,

        (b) dealing expeditiously with the assets acquired by it, and

        (c) protecting or otherwise enhancing the value of those assets, in the interests of the State.


  7. on February 5, 2012 at 12:41 pm paul quigley

    The story is, IMHO, mostly illustrative of our worsening economic debilitation. This is top-of-the-range office accommodation in D4, and the best NAMA can get for it is a partial rental to a company which may create a few hundred highly insecure (see below) service jobs. I don’t want to call them McJobs, because people really need work, but it’s a dire state of affairs, in the face of which, politicians are all pretty helpless.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2011/0908/1224303700239.html


  8. on February 5, 2012 at 2:06 pm John Gallaher

    Looks like a little slap from Oliver.
    “The excellent Emmet Oliver has just been appointed as director of communications”
    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/education/2012/0131/1224310995513.html


  9. on February 5, 2012 at 3:39 pm John Gallaher

    @Patrick,the analogy and whining by Agar is somewhat diminished,by the failure to disclose his investment in The Ritz.
    “Developers David Agar and Jarlaith Sweeney, and Adrian Crawford, a partner at KPMG, were also named as investors in the scheme, along with a number of less well-known business people”
    http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/kenny-putting-on-ritz-for-tax-relief-2245544.html


    • on February 5, 2012 at 3:43 pm namawinelake

      Folks, there is a separate blogpost on the David Agar story

      https://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/nama-understood-to-have-appointed-receivers-to-top-30-developer/


  10. on February 6, 2012 at 4:09 pm Ahura M

    Is 35,000 sq ft a bit tight for 800 employees? I guess if there is no canteen, little or no conference rooms and small bogs, you might get by. Though if it’s a 24hr call centre, the space is probably adequate. Hopefully the number of jobs isn’t being talked up.

    I’d agree with Paul Quigley’s comment. However, we’re in no position to turn away any jobs. Welcome to the smart economy :(


    • on February 6, 2012 at 4:32 pm namawinelake

      @Ahura, fair points though if it is run on two shifts eg 7am – 4pm and 4pm-midnight, it is probably adequate.

      I’m not sure if Ahura is commenting on other comments or on the blogpost but would be surprised that the blogpost above might be interpreted in a way which criticises Minister Bruton’s intervention, either with NAMA or the IDA. The NAMA Act allows lobbying by public representatives and the IDA, as long as the lobbying is made public. And NAMA is entitled to consider the objective “to contribute to the social and economic development of the State.” – s2(b)(viii) of the NAMA Act.

      What the anti-lobbying rules were supposed to prevent was gombeen politicians from corruptly trying to give an advantage to cronies. And whilst no-one is going to criticise Richard Bruton for trying to protect and expand employment, the question is why he didn’t – or why the IDA didn’t if you believe the Sunday Independent story – make public the fact that they had lobbied NAMA. And NAMA too has responsibilities under the anti-lobbying rules.


      • on February 6, 2012 at 6:30 pm Ahura M

        @ NWL,

        just commenting on the bit I found interesting. I consider the anti-lobbying section is more for show than anything else. We didn’t overthrow the gombeens so I expect it will continue. It will only be used if some unconnected gobdaw pisses off NAMA at a time where NAMA wishes to appear whiter than white.

        There’s probably some element or interpretation of the Act that allows Bruton to contact NAMA (i.e. acting on behalf of the MoF). I’m not sure if there is a general ‘for the greater good’ overrider, but in this situation it is understandable that the ‘lobbying’ was not made public.

        Do you think the ‘meat’ of the lobbying should be made public under the NAMA Act? (‘meat’ being the details being asked for or will it be deemed commercially sensitive). Would Bruton be in compliance if the publicly announced “I’m calling NAMA today about something that’s commercially sensitive”? The act doesn’t seem to specify what needs to be made public. So I guess I don’t put too much store in this aspect of the NAMA act. I’m open to change this view if you can come up with a compelling argument.

        It is curious that BSkyB didn’t opt for a cheaper out-of-town location. Maybe Murdocks will suggest relocating HQ to Dublin unless they’re found innocent :)



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Posts

    • Test – 12 November 2018
    • Farewell from NWL
    • Happy 70th Birthday, Michael
    • Of the Week…
    • Noonan denies IBRC legal fees loan approval to Paddy McKillen was in breach of European Commission commitments
    • Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to be added as notice party in Sean Dunne’s bankruptcy
    • NAMA sues Maria Byrne and Graham Byrne in Dublin’s High Court
    • Johnny Ronan finally wins a court case
  • Recent Comments

    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Dorothy Jones on Of the Week…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Foody on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Frank Street on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    who_shot_the_tiger on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Brian Flanagan on Of the Week…
    Robert Browne on Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to b…
  • Twitter Updates

    • Funniest case in Irish legal history? 1. ex-Cllr Fred Forsey convicted of RECEIVING a corrupt payment 2. developer… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 years ago
    • Really looking forward to this at 9pm tonight, esp the first Garda on the scene. Well worth reading this background… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 years ago
    • Tea time on the day the president of the ECB tells us we [in Ireland] are paying more interest on our loans than th… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 years ago
    • “I am grateful for you to refer to Mr Sugarman...on the specific question of Unicredit, responsibility at ECB lies… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 years ago
    • @JMcGuinnessTD now confronts ECB about "the honest whistleblower" @WhistleIRL and his disclosures of liquidity issu… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 years ago
    • Details, including court documents of class action in New York against Ryanair and CEO Michael O'Leary.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 years ago
    • Draghi tells @paulmurphy_TD the ECB doesn't remove govts, the people do, that's democracy. Bet the people will be m… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 years ago
    • Wow! Draghi says there is no net interest cost for the Anglo bonds whilst they're held by the Irish central bank. T… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 years ago
    Follow @namawinelake
  • Click on date for that day’s posts

    February 2012
    M T W T F S S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    272829  
    « Jan   Mar »
  • Blog Stats

    • 5,102,796 hits

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Join 10,037 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: