It’s not often that the outgoing ECB president, Jean-Claude Trichet gives one-to-one televised interviews, but on the occasion yesterday of the announcement of an increase of 0.25% to the ECB’s main interest rate, the 68-year old increasingly shook-looking Frenchman spoke with RTE’s Tony Connelly. Of course the ECB is sensitive to criticism from EuroZone countries still struggling with debt and economic recovery, and the fact that interest rate rises at this particular time are not helpful to the individual nation. Here’s the transcript with my highlighting of the subject of this entry, discussed below the transcript.
Tony Connelly: Mr Trichet, you have said that the interest rate policy is for the EuroZone as a whole. But do you understand the anguish amongst homeowners and mortgage payers in Ireland that after all the sacrifices and the austerity they have already suffered, that they will have even higher monthly payments?
Jean-Claude Trichet: If you were losing the control of inflation expectations because all market rates would increase if the anticipation is high inflation, all interest rates are increasing. So we are maintaining order, we are maintaining confidence. It benefits all, absolutely all citizens.
TC: Can I ask you if you were surprised by the Irish government’s decision to impose losses on senior unsecured bondholders at Anglo Irish bank and Irish Nationwide bank
JCT: We call for full respect of the plan as has been approved, all the plan, nothing but the plan including all what had been said at the time of the approval of the plan
TC: And the plan would I presume dictate that senior bondholders-
JCT: The plan, nothing but the plan, all what has been said at the time.
TC: The government has as you know been looking for a medium term facility to provide a more stable lending schedule for the Irish banks. Is this something that the EC [sic] is prepared to countenance?
JCT: We have ourselves said publicly what we would do, both I would say as regards the normal refinancing that we are proceeding for very, very important amounts. We also have the exceptional ELA which is delivered by bank, the national bank ofIreland[CBI]. And all this accompanied by remarkable efforts that are being made to restructure, to, I would say, deleverage in a very organised and impressive manner with progressively, help as I see it, the banking sector to go back to go back to, absolutely progressively of course with time a better position. It is clearly what is going on and it should go on.
TC: Just to be clear, is it a possibility that some kind of medium term facility-
JCT: No I don’t think it is a possibility.[resolutely] It is not.
TC: Are you concerned about the level and the tone of the debate inIrelandbecause there has been a lot of criticism of European institutions, criticisms in particular the ECB. We have the leader of the Opposition today saying that the interest rate increased was foolish, that it could damage the euro itself. And that the ECB needed serious concern. Are you concerned at the level of debate that is underway inIreland?
JCT: We are helpingIrelandconsiderably. We are re-financing the Irish banks, both us and the national bank ofIreland[CBI] in euros for amounts that have absolutely no precedent, no precedent or equivalent inEuropeand no precedent in the world. So this is what we are doing. On the other hand I have to say that I think that the Irish government, the Irish society and the Irish population is doing an [sic] incredible good work. I have a lot of testimony now thatIrelandwhich had lost a lot of competitiveness in the boom, which has been an [flourish of hands] extraordinary boom is now regaining its competitiveness. I see FDIs [foreign direct investments eg US multinational companies] that are coming back inIreland, becauseIrelandis back to competitiveness. So the adjustment which is of course a difficult one, which is a courageous one, is being processed in a very, very professional way
The first of the two subjects of interest is the burning of senior bondholders. And it is interesting that Jean-Claude refers to “the plan” and “all what has been said at the time”. The plan is presumably the Memorandum of Understanding, a document in the public domain. But it might also encompass the secret sideletter to the MoU, the contents of which have not been made public. But what does “all what has been said at the time” mean? Is this “the influence” darkly referred to by governor of the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI), Patrick Honohan. Or what Minister for Finance, Michael Noonan referred to as “a nod and a wink”? Was “all what has been said at the time” said in the language of extortion, that is, if you don’t repay senior bondholders, then the ECB will withdraw its funding of Irish banks, funding upon which Irish banks now depend as no-one else will lend to them? The pursuit on here of “all what has been said at the time” has been criticised for being useless – after all, what does it add to the story of the Irish bailout to know that there was an explicit threat, that won’t make the reality of the dependence of Irish banks on ECB funding disappear. That is true, it won’t change the financial reality. It might however change the political possibilities and the credibility of any discussion of alternative courses of action.
The second subject is the medium term funding facility. Irish banks today largely depend on what is termed “non-standard liquidity operations” whereby the ECB advances funding to Irish banks in return for collateral. The funding is understood to be provided at 1.5% which is a fraction of the funding costs in the open market, if indeed the open market would advance significant funding at all. In addition to this non-standard funding from the ECB (which totalled over €70bn to the 20-odd banks that service the domestic Irish economy) a further €54bn is provided by the CBI at a higher rate (understood to be about 3.5%). So without central bank support, both nationally and from the ECB, Irish banks would collapse. Plainly that is no way to run a banking system, and given the critical importance of banking to any modern economy, it’s no way to run an economy, or country or society. We don’t do military thinking inIreland, but if we did, we would deem this banking arrangement as a strategic threat to the country. So obviously we have been seeking a medium term facility which would mean the funding of Irish banks was not secured on week-to-week funding. The IMF supports this and the ECB had apparently touted such an arrangement in March 2011. But it is now not to be and the tone in which Jean-Claude said he didn’t think it is a possibility “it is not” is remarkable. The present funding arrangements are due to be withdrawn in October 2011, though they have been in place since 2008 and the chances are they will be extended but it still means Irish banks are heavily exposed to the whims of the ECB and also the freedom to manoeuvre in terms of burning bondholders is severely restricted. The scale of the funding is stratospheric, “no precedent in Europe or the world!” exclaimed Jean-Claude above. I wonder what options, our officials consider they have. Not many, I’ll wager.