I was surprised last year that our new Financial Regulator, Matthew Elderfield didn’t make a point of intervening in mortgage restructuring where banks were strong-arming distressed mortgage borrowers into giving up their tracker mortgages in return for the bank restructuring their mortgage loan – and to be clear, restructuring was not about debt forgiveness, it was about allowing a period of interest-only mortgage payments, or extending the term of the mortgage or giving a mortgage repayment holiday but adding the arrears and interest to the mortgage; there were no free lunches when Irish banks were restructuring mortgages. But what seemed heinous was the fact that banks were demanding that vulnerable borrowers cede their tracker mortgages as a condition of any restructure. This issue was examined in some detail in a post on here “Tiger Robbery versus the great Celtic robbery”. To the best of my knowledge neither the Financial Regulator nor the near-invisible, Financial Services Ombudsman, William Prasifka, confronted the issue.
Tracker mortgages, that is mortgages whose interest rate is set at a fixed margin above the main ECB lending rate and which represent some 400,000 of the 785,000 mortgages in Ireland are a headache for the banks. Even after the 0.25% increase in the main ECB rate two weeks ago, typically tracker mortgage holders are paying 2.25-2.5% per annum. On funds that cost banks in the order of 5% (that is an guesstimate, ECB funding is at 1%, CBI funding at 3%, deposits might pay 4% and the “market” is charging north of 6% and the banks are desperately trying to recoup losses), these 2.25% mortgages force the banks to make losses. Permanent TSB (PTSB) is understood to have approximately 30% of outstanding Irish mortgage debt and is regarded as having the largest stock of tracker mortgages. This morning it made its tracker mortgage borrowers an offer. A cheeky offer.
The offer as reported by RTE is that if tracker borrowers pay down €5,000 from their outstanding mortgage (or multiples of €5,000 – presumably that means €10k, €15k, €20k etc) then PTSB will give the borrower 10% of the payment. The table below shows the interest PTSB would receive on a mortgage whose interest was set at the bank’s standard variable rate of 5.19% and what the bank would receive on a tracker whose interest rate was set at 1% above the main ECB financing rate of 1.25%.
(Click to enlarge)
If your mortgage has less than 4 years to run, then the bank roughly breaks even on the deal announced this morning. If you only have a year to run on your mortgage for example, then the 10% of the €5,000 that PTSB will give you will be worth more than three times what the bank might expect to generate in profit. On the other hand if you have more than four years left on your mortgage then PTSB starts to profit. And at the extreme if you have 30 years outstanding on your mortgage, then PTSB could be expected to profit to the tune of €3,910 (€4,410 less the €500 they pay you) for every €5,000 you repay. Cheeky.
PTSB CEO David Guinane is reported by RTE to have said “’It’s in both parties interest to reduce the amount of outstanding balances on tracker mortgages” Well it might be in your interest if you have a tracker mortgage and are unable to get a better rate of interest on the €5,000 that you are being tempted to repay PTSB. You can get up to 4.2% from PTSB deposit accounts, 9.7% from 10-year Irish sovereign bonds, 9% from residential property. Yet PTSB is prepared to give you less than a measly 2% over a five year period on your €5,000 repayment.
I haven’t seen the letter that has apparently been sent to PTSB tracker mortgage borrowers so I don’t know what information has been provided or what the letter says about seeking independent financial advice. But if past experience is anything to go by, the Financial Regulator and Financial Services Ombudsman will sit on their hands whilst consumers of financial products potentially get fleeced. And lastly, given that borrowers with shorter remaining mortgage periods could benefit from this deal, I wonder what external oversight there will be to ensure PTSB don’t just accept applicants for the deal that have 4 years plus remaining on their mortgages.
UPDATE: 18th April, 2011. The template letter from PTSB offering the “early repayment bonus” is now available here. It should be stressed that the article above is really examining the offer from PTSB’s perspective. It doesn’t consider closely what the offer might mean to the borrower. The borrower will save the tracker interest on the €5,000 each year (currently 2.25% but the outlook from the baseline scenario of the currently ongoing European Banking Authority stress tests is that the ECB rate will rise to an average of 1.75% next year which might give you an tracker rate of 3% then). In addition to getting an annual return equal to the tracker rate, the borrower will get an upfront 10% once-off return which will be worth 10% if you have only one year left on your mortgage, ~5% per annum if you have two years ~3.3% annum if you have three years, ~2.5% annum if you have four years, ~2% annum if you have five years and 0.4% per annum over 24 years. I am surprised that the Financial Regulator or Financial Services Ombudsman has not intervened with the letter. Its presentation is capable of confusing – for example the 10% bonus might mean a return of 10% in one year if you have one year left on your mortgage (unlikely as trackers were mostly a 2000s innovation) or it could mean a return of 0.4% per annum if you have 24 years remaining and the “potential” interest saved is based on what seems like a very long 24 year outstanding period. On an offer that affects your home, that is substantial in financial magnitude and may affect you for decades, I would have expected more close scrutiny of the offer so that tracker borrowers had access to better information – it seems to me that if you have 24 years remaining on your mortgage and can get an annual return of more than the tracker rate plus 0.4% then you will be financially better off taking a rain-check on this offer. However tax considerations, the length of outstanding mortgage, current returns on your investments and savings, risk all come into the equation. So it is all the more surprising that this letter has not been forcibly modified by our financial regulation authorities to provide more independent advice.
Handy for the borrower who has a sale of the property agreed or even in mind and has the cash to repay PTSB in advance.
Thanks for all the insight.
Regards,
Paul
I think this is better viewed from the financial perspective of the borrower only rather than getting worried about what PTsb may make on other loans they hold.
If you can get 10% in yr1 on an overpayment (bearing in mind that you are not assuming the investment risk associated with alternatives) and there is no tax bill (tax equivalent yield is c.13.7% taking equivalent rate of return on deposits to match this as: 10%/1- DirtRateOf27%) then the only thing stopping a person is a cash bias.
Which is fine if that is their want, but taking an overall balance sheet approach rather than interest equivalent or worrying about what PTsb might make shows that it puts a person in a better situation because total liabilities drop more than total assets.
Why is it that no one is focusing on the fact that it’s only paid-up tracker holders, possibly the most financially stable mortgage holders out there, who are benefitting from the first systematic debt write-off strategy from an Irish bank?
Like the ESB discount payment plans a couple if weeks ago, even now it’s still only the better well off in Irish society who are getting the good stuff.
Ohdaboos – the answer to your questions is simple – the banks are fubared and they need cash injections (or loss inducing debt reduction). There is no point going to people who are already in arrears as they don’t have any cash – if they had they would not be in arrears.
This is not a cash giveaway to people who can afford it – it is a reduction in loss debt by a financial institution. It has less to do with helping the individual as it has to do with stabilising the banking institution.
Hi NWL,
Can you tell me where you get the figure of 785,000 mortgages in Ireland? I am looking for an official source for such a figure for an assignment I am working on and I have not been able to find an authoritative source for such a figure. I don’t doubt the figure – it’s simply that I need a source that will stand up to academic scrutiny. Also, do you know of any breakdown of this figure by residential and investment property category? When you say ‘mortgages’ are these housing mortgages or can it include commercial or industrial property?
Thanks,
Bunbury
@Bunbury, the Financial Regulator, Matthew Elderfield produces quarterly data on mortgages and arrears. The latest report for Q4, 2010 showed “that at the end of December 2010 there were 786,164 private residential mortgage accounts held in Ireland” The report for Q1, 2011 is due at the end of May 2011.
http://www.financialregulator.ie/press-area/press-releases/Pages/LatestArrearsandRepossessionsFiguresshow57ofMortgageAccounts.aspx
@NWL
Thanks for that. I’m embarrassed as it appears I didn’t look hard enough!
Daydreaming on the possibility of a group of Tracker Mortgage holders offering to buy back their loans from the banks at something close to current market value. I’ve currently north of 300k outstanding @ ECB +0.9% – yeah I know I’m lucky. At the guesstimate cost of funds given by NWL above @ 5% I’m costing them circa 9k / annum. Even with reasonable assumptions on the tightening of the cost-of-funds spreads over time as the economy improves my mortgage is a liability on the bank’s balance sheet for a considerable period. Can any contributor suggest a valuation metric for this and similar loans – what should it cost me to buy my loan from the bank?
If enough reasonably well-off people were interested in this could a fund be created (SIPPable?) that would provide liquidity to banks, remove a current liability, while reducing net debt for the investors?
Iggy
@Iggy, I guess the crucial assumption will be around how long it takes banks to get back to a position whereby trackers are profitable. As far as I can tell, the latest projection on the ECB rate is that it will be 2-2.5% at the end of next year (that comes from the European Banking Authority’s stress test assumptions presently being applied to banks whose stress test results will be reported in June 2011). But beyond that, when will trackers be profitable again for banks? 5 years? 10 years? That will be the first of three assumptions needed for any calculation of how much you redeeming your mortgage should be.
The second assumption is what funds will cost the bank until such time as your mortgage is profitable and thirdly what the ECB rate will be.
So assume that trackers will be profitable again from 2020 and that the differential between your tracker rate and the cost of funds rate for the banks is 2% for that 10 year period then the net present value of your tracker’s cost to the banks would be €6,000 in 2011 and say [€6,000 / 1.02 in 2012 using a 2% discount rate for inflation only] + [€6,000 / (1.02 *1.02) in 2013] etc or about €55,000 in total so you might suggest the bank allows you to buyout your €300,000 for €245,000 today.
Others may have other views on the calculation but I think it will follow the format shown above but the parameters might be different.
I owe 133,000 to PTSB; My rate is 2.25% with 16.5 years remaining on my mortgage. Can anyone suggest a reasonable settlement figure that I should offer to clear the mortgage