• Home
  • NAMA property for sale
  • About
  • The Developers
  • The Tranches

NAMA Wine Lake

Click the green link above for latest news and over 2,600 related articles. NAMA – National Asset Management Agency – part of Ireland's response to its banking crisis and property bubble

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« So you’re a developer and have just received notification that your loans are in NAMA …
Google set to acquire Montevetro building in €90m NAMA deal »

Is NAMA breaking competition law in its dealings with the Revenue Commissioners?

January 25, 2011 by namawinelake

Not that developers can expect any great outpouring of sympathy but in recent days there have been suggestions (for example here and here) that NAMA is actively sharing information with the Revenue Commissioners to “identify any tax implications arising”, according to Neil Callanan at the Sunday Tribune.

It should be remembered that NAMA is effectively a bank and when granting approval to the NAMA scheme, the European Commission was careful to consider NAMA’s position with respect to other banks to ensure there was no distortion of competition. The EC specifically considered a proposal originally made for the NAMA project, that NAMA would be able to access records from the Revenue Commissioners on developers. NAMA’s powers in this area were set out under section 204 (3) of the  NAMA Act:

“Notwithstanding any other enactment, the Revenue Commissioners shall disclose to NAMA information in relation to a named relevant person that, in the opinion of the Revenue Commissioners or of NAMA, is required by NAMA for the purposes of the performance of its functions under this Act, and that is in the possession of the Revenue Commissioners, or of which the Revenue Commissioners have knowledge.”

The Commission acknowledged the undertaking given by “the Irish authorities” that this provision of the NAMA Act would not be used. The Commission had nothing to say on the preceding sub-section of the NAMA Act, section 204 (2):

“Notwithstanding any provision of this Act or any other enactment—
(a) the Revenue Commissioners may, for the purposes of the performance of their functions under Part 42 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 and any regulations made under that Part, seek from NAMA information in the possession of NAMA, or which NAMA has knowledge of, in relation to a named relevant person, and
(b) where NAMA is in possession of, or has knowledge of, the information referred to in paragraph (a), NAMA shall provide it to the Revenue Commissioners.”

You would now have to ask if NAMA is engineering a subversion of s 204(3). The Sunday Tribune refer to the significant fact that NAMA’s chairman is former chairman of the Revenue Commissioners, Frank Daly and a casual observer might infer that there was a two-way exchange between the Revenue Commissioners and NAMA which effectively gives NAMA the ability to question a developer’s business plan by reference to tax records  through the effective use of the Revenue Commissioners to investigate the contents of the developer’s business plan .

It would however be difficult to defend a developer in such circumstances – after all if the developer has not been honest in disclosing assets then most people would expect the most draconian investigations and penalties. However it seems that NAMA is stealing an advantage over non-NAMA banks operating in the State. Will the Revenue Commissioners actively engage with National Irish Bank, Ulster Bank, KBC, ACC or Rabobank and others with a view to assisting those banks maximise recovery of debts?

UPDATE: 21st April, 2011. The Revenue Commissioners report for 2010 is now available. Reporting today states that so far, the Revenue has “received data” on 108 cases from NAMA.

Advertisement

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Banks, Developers, NAMA | 8 Comments

8 Responses

  1. on January 26, 2011 at 1:21 am who_shot_the_tiger

    Whatever the accountants are charging NAMA for business plans, according to a mid sized developer who was crying on my shoulder, he is being charged €100,000 for his business plan.

    These people are from the same pool of accountants that NAMA use to approve the self same business plans.

    Double jobbing, conflicts of interest and very incestuous indeed.

    Is there one accountant left with a conscience?


    • on January 26, 2011 at 8:00 am namawinelake

      So up to €200,000 spent by NAMA on business plan review and perhaps €200,000 spent by a large-scale developer on preparing the business plan – perhaps €400,000 spent on professional fees (presumably accountants, tax specialists and property lawyers and consultants) that without NAMA wouldn’t have been spent. Of course that represents 2-3 days interest on a €1.7bn exposure which was the average in Tranche 1 but it’s still an impressive sum to be injected into the mostly Irish professional services sector.

      Interesting on the conflicts. But take PwC which is one of NAMA panel members. Many of the larger developers will presumably have used that firm in the past and PwC would presumably claim it enforced Chinese Walls between different functions/teams/consultants. But on the face of it, it does look incestuous.


  2. on January 26, 2011 at 12:47 pm who_shot_the_tiger

    The advice to builders from those in NAMA and from the accountants themselves is that if you want your business plan approved you use an accountant on the NAMA panel.


  3. on January 26, 2011 at 2:20 pm Frank

    Why would NAMA or a developer use an accounting firm to create or verify a business plan? What do accountants know about real estate development? I thought that was part of the original problem. Every accountant, lawyer, banker, tom, dick, and harry in Ireland, thought they were property developers. Now we have a situation where the government, based on advice from accounting firms, is approving real estate development business plans which are being created by accounting firms. The very same accounting firms that were an integral part of the sorry fiasco. To use laymen’s terms, these accounting firms verified to the bank’s shareholders and bondholders that the banks financial statements were ‘true and accurate.’ Correct?

    When dealing with a Kafkaesque bureaucracy such as NAMA, is it better to be truthful or tell it what it wants to hear?


  4. on January 27, 2011 at 12:07 am who_shot_the_tiger

    The developers use them (the panel accountants) because they have been told by NAMA insiders that these same accountants produce the information in a form that NAMA (or the accountants acting for NAMA) understand and will approve.

    They have been told that if they produce the information themselves NAMA (or its accountants) will likely consider it “amateurish” and not produced in a professional manner or in a format that they can understand. Consequently, they will be unlikely to approve it.

    Many “clued-in” developers are therefore using the NAMA panel accountants to produce their business plans – at a price, of course.

    But then, how do you value a positive result?


  5. on January 27, 2011 at 11:43 am BaNAMA Republic

    WSTT, My information is still that no business plans have been agreed between any developer and NAMA. Just wondering if you have heard anything different?


    • on January 27, 2011 at 12:03 pm namawinelake

      Hi BaNAMA Republic,

      Can you define “agreed” perhaps by reference to the following stages:

      (1) Memorandum of Understanding signed by *both* NAMA and the developer
      (2) Heads of Terms signed by *both* NAMA and the developer
      (3) New Loan Agreement signed by *both* NAMA and developer

      My information is that no plan has yet gotten to stage 2 or 3.

      WSTT?


  6. on January 27, 2011 at 1:17 pm Banama Republic

    My information is that Stage 1 has not been passed by ‘both’ parties yet. Field day for the solicitors by all accounts. However do not have complete picture so I am looking to be corrected



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Posts

    • Test – 12 November 2018
    • Farewell from NWL
    • Happy 70th Birthday, Michael
    • Of the Week…
    • Noonan denies IBRC legal fees loan approval to Paddy McKillen was in breach of European Commission commitments
    • Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to be added as notice party in Sean Dunne’s bankruptcy
    • NAMA sues Maria Byrne and Graham Byrne in Dublin’s High Court
    • Johnny Ronan finally wins a court case
  • Recent Comments

    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Dorothy Jones on Of the Week…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Foody on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Frank Street on Of the Week…
    Wisemama on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    John Gallaher on Of the Week…
    who_shot_the_tiger on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    Sean Bean on Eddie Hobbs’s US “partner” fir…
    otto on Of the Week…
    Brian Flanagan on Of the Week…
    Robert Browne on Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to b…
  • Twitter Updates

    • Funniest case in Irish legal history? 1. ex-Cllr Fred Forsey convicted of RECEIVING a corrupt payment 2. developer… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Really looking forward to this at 9pm tonight, esp the first Garda on the scene. Well worth reading this background… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Tea time on the day the president of the ECB tells us we [in Ireland] are paying more interest on our loans than th… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • “I am grateful for you to refer to Mr Sugarman...on the specific question of Unicredit, responsibility at ECB lies… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • @JMcGuinnessTD now confronts ECB about "the honest whistleblower" @WhistleIRL and his disclosures of liquidity issu… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Details, including court documents of class action in New York against Ryanair and CEO Michael O'Leary.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Draghi tells @paulmurphy_TD the ECB doesn't remove govts, the people do, that's democracy. Bet the people will be m… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    • Wow! Draghi says there is no net interest cost for the Anglo bonds whilst they're held by the Irish central bank. T… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago
    Follow @namawinelake
  • Click on date for that day’s posts

    January 2011
    M T W T F S S
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
    « Dec   Feb »
  • Blog Stats

    • 5,114,116 hits

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Join 1,326 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • NAMA Wine Lake
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: