Consider the scenario – NAMA buys a loan which was used to develop an estate; the estate lies partially complete and NAMA want to sell some of the properties; enter the County and City Managers’ Association (CCMA); unless the estate is given a certificate of compliance by the local authorities then not one house can be sold. And in return for these certificates local authorities want an estimated €846m in development levies from either NAMA or the developer depending on the status of the loan. Of course in some cases the local authority will accept a few houses in lieu of payment, elsewhere they’ll be wanting hard cash. The story is reported by the Sunday Business Post who claim there is an ongoing dialogue between the CCMA and NAMA.
A senior official is quoted as saying he believes the local authorities are “holding the reins” on this issue. No compliance certificate, no sale; no sale and NAMA will face difficulty unless of course the estate is to demolished which might hand the reins back to NAMA.
There is an emerging need for co-ordination between NAMA and local authorities and it would seem that in the interaction between the two sides each holds some advantages, in the case of local authorities planning and compliance requirements and in the case of NAMA, cash and decision-making about the future of developments. I have updated the highly subjective and personal NAMA stakeholder graph to include local authorities and consider them to a medium to low requirement for information and a medium to high importance to NAMA.