<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAMA challenges “moral integrity” of developer seeking creditor protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/11/09/nama-challenges-moral-integrity-of-developer-seeking-creditor-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/11/09/nama-challenges-moral-integrity-of-developer-seeking-creditor-protection/</link>
	<description>Click the green link above for latest news and over 2,600 related articles. NAMA - National Asset Management Agency - part of Ireland&#039;s response to its banking crisis and property bubble</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:13:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ryan</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/11/09/nama-challenges-moral-integrity-of-developer-seeking-creditor-protection/#comment-46042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=12422#comment-46042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@NWL

One has to wonder if the NAMA spokesperson understands examinership, given the statement
&quot;he report merely says NAMA “had concerns about the moral integrity of the petition and how it had proceeded and also had concerns about potential diversion of monies by the company prior to examinership”

The application for examinership will not be heard until Nov 15th. Until that time (up to 10 days allowed) the company is under the protection of the court.
NAMA will presumably get its chance on Nov 15th.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NWL</p>
<p>One has to wonder if the NAMA spokesperson understands examinership, given the statement<br />
&#8220;he report merely says NAMA “had concerns about the moral integrity of the petition and how it had proceeded and also had concerns about potential diversion of monies by the company prior to examinership”</p>
<p>The application for examinership will not be heard until Nov 15th. Until that time (up to 10 days allowed) the company is under the protection of the court.<br />
NAMA will presumably get its chance on Nov 15th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
