<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NTMA publishes annual report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/</link>
	<description>Click the green link above for latest news and over 2,600 related articles. NAMA - National Asset Management Agency - part of Ireland&#039;s response to its banking crisis and property bubble</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:27:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gar ocos</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-31091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gar ocos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 23:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-31091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of the €20.7 billion of NPRF bailout investment in Aib and BoI, €3.8 is a &#039;capital contribution&#039;, neither shares nor loan, which is non-repayable. This is part of the bigger €6.054 billion, the balance being paid directly to Aib from the Exchequer. The shares element in Bank of Ireland at €2.85 billion is somewhat incorrect. Circa €1 billion of this money was refunded back to the NPRF on sale  of shares to US consortium, so that the real cost of shares is circa €1.85 billion.  (The money was then used by the government to allocate the convertible loan of €1 billion to Aib - at 10% per annum.)  Also, the Preference Shares at €5.36 billion are redeemable at par, so the par value seems fairer - making a difference of €1.6 billion. The Balance Sheet value of the BoI ordinary shares (15.2%) at 31 December 2011 was around €1.25 billion, not the €370 million per accounts valuation - a difference of around €900 million.

The Balance Sheet value of Aib shares at 31 December 2011 was actually greater than the investment amount of €8.7 billion by NPRF. 

If the non-repayable &#039;capital contribution&#039; (all €6.054 billion) is eventually offset against sundry banking crisis income to the government (bank guarantee + central bank interest), then the ratio is 15.9/19.7 or 75%.

This is very different from the valuation ratio of 7.9/20.7, i.e. 40% of cost, inferred in the NTMA report]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the €20.7 billion of NPRF bailout investment in Aib and BoI, €3.8 is a &#8216;capital contribution&#8217;, neither shares nor loan, which is non-repayable. This is part of the bigger €6.054 billion, the balance being paid directly to Aib from the Exchequer. The shares element in Bank of Ireland at €2.85 billion is somewhat incorrect. Circa €1 billion of this money was refunded back to the NPRF on sale  of shares to US consortium, so that the real cost of shares is circa €1.85 billion.  (The money was then used by the government to allocate the convertible loan of €1 billion to Aib &#8211; at 10% per annum.)  Also, the Preference Shares at €5.36 billion are redeemable at par, so the par value seems fairer &#8211; making a difference of €1.6 billion. The Balance Sheet value of the BoI ordinary shares (15.2%) at 31 December 2011 was around €1.25 billion, not the €370 million per accounts valuation &#8211; a difference of around €900 million.</p>
<p>The Balance Sheet value of Aib shares at 31 December 2011 was actually greater than the investment amount of €8.7 billion by NPRF. </p>
<p>If the non-repayable &#8216;capital contribution&#8217; (all €6.054 billion) is eventually offset against sundry banking crisis income to the government (bank guarantee + central bank interest), then the ratio is 15.9/19.7 or 75%.</p>
<p>This is very different from the valuation ratio of 7.9/20.7, i.e. 40% of cost, inferred in the NTMA report</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob S</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-30987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-30987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is maybe slightly OT but:

Until now, what has stopped Irish Pension Funds purchasing bonds from the NTMA?

I have read reasons such as the Sovereign bonds are not long enough maturity-wise and that the recent high yields make them perhaps unacceptably risky (although not an excuse during the boom years).

Is that it or was there something more legalistic preventing Irish Pension Funds&#039; participation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is maybe slightly OT but:</p>
<p>Until now, what has stopped Irish Pension Funds purchasing bonds from the NTMA?</p>
<p>I have read reasons such as the Sovereign bonds are not long enough maturity-wise and that the recent high yields make them perhaps unacceptably risky (although not an excuse during the boom years).</p>
<p>Is that it or was there something more legalistic preventing Irish Pension Funds&#8217; participation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob S</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-30979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-30979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@NWL

Fair enough.

Really get a headache trying to cource all these bloody recaps.

Point stands indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NWL</p>
<p>Fair enough.</p>
<p>Really get a headache trying to cource all these bloody recaps.</p>
<p>Point stands indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ryan</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-30969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-30969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@NWL
Sorry I mixed up my P&#039;s and my S&#039;s in my &#039;postscripts&#039;. Perhaps I thought that as a humble citizen I was being PSSSSD on !!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NWL<br />
Sorry I mixed up my P&#8217;s and my S&#8217;s in my &#8216;postscripts&#8217;. Perhaps I thought that as a humble citizen I was being PSSSSD on !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ryan</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-30968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-30968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@NWL

Patrick Kavanagh in Tarry Flynn gave a hilarious account of his horse that he called GLUG. Even though he knew the horse to a disaster, the country way was to praise him to the skies until one had managed to get rid of him.

Now if the NTMA or minister was intending disposal in the near or even distant future, the way to raise the asking price is hardly by reducing by over 50%.

Either way my point stands. Could I pose the question another way.
What value does the Minister attribute to AIB in which he holds a 98%stake. Is it €14 billion or is it €6 billion.
There is only an €8 billion difference of opinion in those advising him. Those highly paid people advising him and those highly paid advisers (Goodbody&#039;s), advising the advisers that advise him.

But &#039;Shure&#039;  maybe was is €8billion when it comes banks or highly paid advisers or public interest directors.


PS. I note that there is no detail on remuneration levels of staff provided in the NTMA report.

PSS: Note also that average annual return since 2001 on discretionary investments is 3.1%. A performance that has made some well of people into millionaires and that&#039;s is not counting their pension millions. The generosity of a bankrupt State know no bounds.

Now a leaving cert student would have got at least that much by putting the money on deposit with a few different banks.

PSSS: The investment portfolio is worth looking at. It looks like the NTMA like to invest in pretty much every country and company in the world, except Ireland (with a few small exceptions). Great to know that we are doing our bit for world industry.
Personally I would dump the lot of them and invest in capital projects at home, particularly broadband. We don&#039;t have an obligation to support companies around the world, do we?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NWL</p>
<p>Patrick Kavanagh in Tarry Flynn gave a hilarious account of his horse that he called GLUG. Even though he knew the horse to a disaster, the country way was to praise him to the skies until one had managed to get rid of him.</p>
<p>Now if the NTMA or minister was intending disposal in the near or even distant future, the way to raise the asking price is hardly by reducing by over 50%.</p>
<p>Either way my point stands. Could I pose the question another way.<br />
What value does the Minister attribute to AIB in which he holds a 98%stake. Is it €14 billion or is it €6 billion.<br />
There is only an €8 billion difference of opinion in those advising him. Those highly paid people advising him and those highly paid advisers (Goodbody&#8217;s), advising the advisers that advise him.</p>
<p>But &#8216;Shure&#8217;  maybe was is €8billion when it comes banks or highly paid advisers or public interest directors.</p>
<p>PS. I note that there is no detail on remuneration levels of staff provided in the NTMA report.</p>
<p>PSS: Note also that average annual return since 2001 on discretionary investments is 3.1%. A performance that has made some well of people into millionaires and that&#8217;s is not counting their pension millions. The generosity of a bankrupt State know no bounds.</p>
<p>Now a leaving cert student would have got at least that much by putting the money on deposit with a few different banks.</p>
<p>PSSS: The investment portfolio is worth looking at. It looks like the NTMA like to invest in pretty much every country and company in the world, except Ireland (with a few small exceptions). Great to know that we are doing our bit for world industry.<br />
Personally I would dump the lot of them and invest in capital projects at home, particularly broadband. We don&#8217;t have an obligation to support companies around the world, do we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: namawinelake</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-30960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[namawinelake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-30960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Joseph, without looking at the detail of AIB&#039;s accounts at 31 Dec 2011, I would say the difference is down to methods of valuation. Remember the difference between fair values and carrying values?

http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/2011-annual-reports-for-irish-banks-reveal-potentially-catastrophic-losses-and-additional-bailouts-requirements/

There are also differences in how you would value a company as a going concern and how you would value it with the prospect of an immediate sale. So you can have two very different valuations on assets, be they loans or entire companies.

I would GUESS the advice from Goodbody on which the NPRF based its values on was on the basis of an imminent disposal, but there is practically no detail to assist in examining that view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joseph, without looking at the detail of AIB&#8217;s accounts at 31 Dec 2011, I would say the difference is down to methods of valuation. Remember the difference between fair values and carrying values?</p>
<p><a href="http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/2011-annual-reports-for-irish-banks-reveal-potentially-catastrophic-losses-and-additional-bailouts-requirements/" rel="nofollow">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/2011-annual-reports-for-irish-banks-reveal-potentially-catastrophic-losses-and-additional-bailouts-requirements/</a></p>
<p>There are also differences in how you would value a company as a going concern and how you would value it with the prospect of an immediate sale. So you can have two very different valuations on assets, be they loans or entire companies.</p>
<p>I would GUESS the advice from Goodbody on which the NPRF based its values on was on the basis of an imminent disposal, but there is practically no detail to assist in examining that view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ryan</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-30959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-30959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@NWL

The directors of AIB show a book value for the bank of €14.4 billion at December 2011. One assumes its auditors KPMG concur.
Why then did the NTMA on the advice of Goodbody&#039;s say that the State&#039;s98% share was worth only €6 billion.
Is AIB lying? Does the NTMA believe AIB accounts to be rubbish?

How does the Minister view a situation whereby the directors of a bank in which he owns 98% show a book value of the bank at &gt;€14billion, but the NTMA that reports to him, does not believe a bloody word of it and puts the book value of the bank at €6billion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@NWL</p>
<p>The directors of AIB show a book value for the bank of €14.4 billion at December 2011. One assumes its auditors KPMG concur.<br />
Why then did the NTMA on the advice of Goodbody&#8217;s say that the State&#8217;s98% share was worth only €6 billion.<br />
Is AIB lying? Does the NTMA believe AIB accounts to be rubbish?</p>
<p>How does the Minister view a situation whereby the directors of a bank in which he owns 98% show a book value of the bank at &gt;€14billion, but the NTMA that reports to him, does not believe a bloody word of it and puts the book value of the bank at €6billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gallaher</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-30928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Gallaher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-30928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The largest investment in Irish real estate is in IPUT.
http://www.nprf.ie/Publications/2012/NPRFReport2011.pdf
And yep guessed rite,who do you think does the valuations ?

&quot;From 1967 to 2004 Jones Lang LaSalle acted as consultant surveyor, property manager and valuer and advised in the acquisition of a number of properties for the Trust. From January 2005 Jones Lang LaSalle’s role is valuer, property manager for multi-let properties and agent for specific agency and investment instructions.&quot;
Small little world!
http://www.iput.ie/uploads/documents/reports/IPUT_Annual_Report_2011.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The largest investment in Irish real estate is in IPUT.<br />
<a href="http://www.nprf.ie/Publications/2012/NPRFReport2011.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nprf.ie/Publications/2012/NPRFReport2011.pdf</a><br />
And yep guessed rite,who do you think does the valuations ?</p>
<p>&#8220;From 1967 to 2004 Jones Lang LaSalle acted as consultant surveyor, property manager and valuer and advised in the acquisition of a number of properties for the Trust. From January 2005 Jones Lang LaSalle’s role is valuer, property manager for multi-let properties and agent for specific agency and investment instructions.&#8221;<br />
Small little world!<br />
<a href="http://www.iput.ie/uploads/documents/reports/IPUT_Annual_Report_2011.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.iput.ie/uploads/documents/reports/IPUT_Annual_Report_2011.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gallaher</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-30921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Gallaher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-30921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Vince enjoyed the Tolkien reference,it&#039;s me having a bit of fun at John Mulcahy&#039;s age,x Jones Lang.Speaking of expense unlikely,he&#039;s hanging around for the money,what with his stock in JL and all that !
From post above,apologies if too obtuse.
&quot;For the NAMA audience, we learn the Agency now has 214 employees, that NAMA’s John Mulcahy is advising the NPRF on its property investments, the NPRF has €507m of property investments and last year they returned 9%. A measly €51m of property investment is in Ireland...&quot;
Will check later,but it would be too funny if JL was the valuer for NPRF,no idea but would not be too surprising.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vince enjoyed the Tolkien reference,it&#8217;s me having a bit of fun at John Mulcahy&#8217;s age,x Jones Lang.Speaking of expense unlikely,he&#8217;s hanging around for the money,what with his stock in JL and all that !<br />
From post above,apologies if too obtuse.<br />
&#8220;For the NAMA audience, we learn the Agency now has 214 employees, that NAMA’s John Mulcahy is advising the NPRF on its property investments, the NPRF has €507m of property investments and last year they returned 9%. A measly €51m of property investment is in Ireland&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Will check later,but it would be too funny if JL was the valuer for NPRF,no idea but would not be too surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/ntma-publishes-annual-report/#comment-30917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vince]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://namawinelake.wordpress.com/?p=10873#comment-30917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry, but this and a nod to reality means it should be written in Sindarin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but this and a nod to reality means it should be written in Sindarin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
